Teams

LAC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 4.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-12vs HMTCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMridula Sugadhan / Tucker Humphrey vs Erika Preuss / Mitzi Johnson6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSarah Schupp vs Jennifer Wiley6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCarol Bradford / Bobbi Billings vs Nora Harrison / Kimberly Tomlinson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeverly Kalil / Brooke Larson vs Rhonda Bruschke / Suzanne Hale6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-07-05vs MEA GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrooke Larson / Mridula Sugadhan vs Tanya Saarva / Katie Hawk6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesSara Palmer vs Lauren Dise6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarol Bradford / Marta Rocha vs Karina Hauser / Sue McGee2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHolly Brown / Chelsea Crowell vs Jeanne Cleveland / Susan Crandall6-1, 7-5
2022-07-02vs BRMST GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesChelsea Crowell / Tucker Humphrey vs Emily Pedersen / Christine LaBerge6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Schupp vs Gail Quinn6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeather Brinkman / Sara Palmer vs Heidi Dery / Mari Tamura6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarta Rocha / Carol Bradford vs Yoshiko Yamashita / Tina Gray2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-28vs BRMST GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristeen Dehning / Tucker Humphrey vs Emily Pedersen / Christine LaBerge6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesChelsea Crowell vs Yoshiko Yamashita6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBeverly Kalil / Sara Palmer vs Elizabeth Korniczky / Mari Tamura6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMarta Rocha / Carol Bradford vs Gail Quinn / Heidi Dery6-0, 6-3
2022-06-07vs HMTCWon 40
W#1 DoublesBeverly Kalil / Brooke Larson vs Susanna Styve / Erika Preuss6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHeather Brinkman vs Jennifer Wiley6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristeen Dehning / Mridula Sugadhan vs Kimberly Tomlinson / Mitzi Johnson6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCarol Bradford / Bobbi Billings vs Suzanne Hale / Elina George7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Chelsea Crowell
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.46
Kristeen Dehning
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.34
Brooke Larson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Bobbi Billings
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Sarah Schupp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.08
Sara Palmer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.02
Heather Brinkman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.96
Holly Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Carol Bradford
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Beverly Kalil
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Judith Laursen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marta Rocha
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mridula Sugadhan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tucker Humphrey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chelsea Crowell + Tucker Humphrey8067% games+10.5% vs expected
Beverly Kalil + Sara Palmer7352% games−0.3% vs expected
Bobbi Billings + Carol Bradford4546% games−2.5% vs expected
Carol Bradford + Marta Rocha4548% games−3.4% vs expected
Beverly Kalil + Brooke Larson4448% games−6.5% vs expected
Mridula Sugadhan + Brooke Larson3253% gamesnot enough data
Holly Brown + Brooke Larson224 matchesnot enough data
Heather Brinkman + Tucker Humphrey314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chelsea Crowell
129W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
4.49
Kristeen Dehning
40W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
4.46
4.5
Brooke Larson
20W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
4.34
4.5
Bobbi Billings
51W–65L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.20
Sarah Schupp
20W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
Sara Palmer
29W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Heather Brinkman
22W–14L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
Holly Brown
23W–40L career · 1 line in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.96
4
Carol Bradford
35W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
Beverly Kalil
22W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Judith Laursen
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marta Rocha
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mridula Sugadhan
20W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tucker Humphrey
42W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.