Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Lunghi)(EPTC#4)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-11-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesSheby Parker / Becca Mcbroom vs Nicole Roldan / Sylvia Vega6-1, 6-1
2023-09-23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBecca Mcbroom vs Megan Harris0-6, 3-6
2023-09-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCristina da Costa / Becca Mcbroom vs Celia Al-Tahan / Lourdes Olivas0-6, 0-6
2023-09-09Lost 01
L#3 DoublesIyari Fierro / Becca Mcbroom vs Monica Medina / Rocio Avila2-6, 3-6
2021-11-30Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBecca Mcbroom vs Erika Avila1-6, 2-6
2021-11-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCristina da Costa / Becca Mcbroom vs Melissa Isaac / Adriana Zaragoza0-6, 1-6
2021-10-27Won 10
W#2 SinglesBecca Mcbroom vs Loretta Pineda6-3, 6-4
2021-10-21vs GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Arriola)(EPTC#1)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSheby Parker / Becca Mcbroom vs Esther Fierro / ELizabeth McKinney1-6, 6-7
2021-09-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKarin Delafuente / Becca Mcbroom vs Patricia Samonte / Jordan Bryant2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Belinda Fernandez
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.84
Diane Lunghi
usually #2 Doubles 51%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published 3
2.74
Becca Mcbroom
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3
2.67
Cristina da Costa
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
Esther Orona
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Gloria King
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published
Helga Sauza
usually #1 Singles 48%, also #2 Singles 32% · published
Iyari Fierro
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 35% · published
Jennifer Bush
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Ibarra
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Kismet Sozer
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Lori Armendariz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Patricia Moye Holderman
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Randi Cabrera
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sheby Parker
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Stephanie Beckles
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Veronica Ortiz
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Yuri Caire
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Belinda Fernandez + Sheby Parker5164% games+13.2% vs expected
Kismet Sozer + Randi Cabrera7849% games+11.5% vs expected
Jennifer Bush + Diane Lunghi151057% games+6.9% vs expected
Esther Orona + Diane Lunghi462059% games+1.0% vs expected
Cristina da Costa + Sheby Parker2639% games+0.4% vs expected
Esther Orona + Veronica Ortiz4554% games−2.1% vs expected
Randi Cabrera + Cristina da Costa6946% games−2.5% vs expected
Randi Cabrera + Patricia Moye Holderman3747% games−4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Belinda Fernandez
54W–62L career · type A · 16 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Diane Lunghi
141W–95L career · 39 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Becca Mcbroom
22W–19L career · 9 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Cristina da Costa
67W–91L career · 29 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
Esther Orona
123W–106L career · 44 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gloria King
100W–61L career · 32 lines in 2024
not enough data
Helga Sauza
74W–41L career · 25 lines in 2024
not enough data
Iyari Fierro
28W–18L career · 19 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Bush
71W–79L career · 24 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Ibarra
35W–42L career · 16 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kismet Sozer
41W–54L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Armendariz
55W–56L career · 25 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Moye Holderman
66W–59L career · 26 lines in 2024
not enough data
Randi Cabrera
54W–66L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheby Parker
54W–46L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Beckles
69W–60L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Veronica Ortiz
37W–36L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
Yuri Caire
52W–39L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.