Teams

TFunderburk (Life Time)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 7.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-10vs SHicks (Carmel)Won 20
W#2 DoublesLea Powell / Joelle Surprenant vs Jill Halverstam / Wendy Solomon6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDana Ferguson / Anna McLaughlin vs Dorian Dipangrazio / Beth Hahn7-6, 6-4
2024-10-04vs CHighfield (FCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnna McLaughlin / Leezah Pratt vs Jamie Thomas / Lauren Epperly6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-20vs KSimmons (Lifetime)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoelle Surprenant / Leezah Pratt vs Alison Oxendine / Priscilla Navarrete6-4, 6-0
2024-09-13vs ABVanMeter (Southampton)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJoelle Surprenant / Lea Powell vs Jessica Durham / Esther Craig7-5, 6-4
2024-08-20vs KWahr/TWalker (Carmel)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJoelle Surprenant / Lea Powell vs Heidi Friedman / Lauren Mulligan6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Ashley Bowles
published 4
3.67
Smita Merchant
published
3.57
Michelle Crawford
published
3.48
Anna McLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Emily Breeze Watson
published
3.39
Judith Skelton
published
3.35
Susan Knowlton
published
3.31
Dana Ferguson
published 3.5
3.27
Lea Powell
published
3.25
Joelle Surprenant
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.12
Anita Dowker
published 3.5
3.08
Teneika Funderburk
published 3.5
3.06
Karen Papaleo
published
Kacey Kopley
published
Leezah Pratt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Crawford + Emily Breeze Watson7551% games+13.3% vs expected
Teneika Funderburk + Anna McLaughlin3744% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashley Bowles
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Smita Merchant
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Michelle Crawford
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.57
4
Anna McLaughlin
34W–73L career · 2 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
Emily Breeze Watson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.45
Judith Skelton
20W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Susan Knowlton
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Dana Ferguson
26W–26L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Lea Powell
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.27
4
Joelle Surprenant
71W–103L career · 6 lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.25
3.5
Anita Dowker
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Teneika Funderburk
90W–110L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.08
Karen Papaleo
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.06
Kacey Kopley
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leezah Pratt
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.