Teams

Billings/18/3.5/M/Stonecreek

2025 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.64 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alex Billings
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Cristian Topescu
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 4
3.52
Dane Landry
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Chris Corkern
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.37
David Appe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Carson Abrams
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
Brett Fortenberry
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Franco Centanni
usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Jordan Spinosa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Mark Farrow
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Mason Sharp
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Matt Slimming
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Pasko Skarica
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Scott Alphonso
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Shane Story
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Spencer Rossie
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Singles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Franco Centanni + Dane Landry6070% gamesnot enough data
Mark Farrow + Scott Alphonso314 matchesnot enough data
David Appe + Carson Abrams314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alex Billings
16W–2L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Cristian Topescu
24W–12L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dane Landry
22W–2L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Chris Corkern
14W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
David Appe
10W–7L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Carson Abrams
23W–4L career · 18 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Brett Fortenberry
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Franco Centanni
21W–8L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jordan Spinosa
15W–4L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Farrow
17W–12L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mason Sharp
9W–0L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Slimming
48W–25L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pasko Skarica
14W–8L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Alphonso
20W–5L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shane Story
7W–0L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Spencer Rossie
15W–2L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.