Teams

MORAGA CC 18AW2.5+B-DT

2026 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 2.5+

15 players · average NTRP 2.71 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-12vs SLEEPY HOLLOW 18AW2.5+A-DTWon 21
L#1 DoublesAudrey Mao / Mina Penna vs Jennifer Acker / Dena McManis3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBeth Chang vs Kate Woodcox6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCourtney Pickering / Maureen Schmidt vs Megan Sullivan / Erica Desjardins6-2, 6-2
2026-06-11vs SLEEPY HOLLOW 18AW2.5+A-DTWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaty Anderson / Sabrina Shippey vs Leah Branson / Katie Shogan6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesVaughan Woodson vs Kate Woodcox6-1, 6-4
2026-05-20vs MEADOW STC 18AW2.5+A-DTLost 12
W#1 DoublesBeth Chang / Mina Penna vs Christine Nguyen / Joanna Allen6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlexis Mapel vs Kristen Steinert2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisah Kmet / Courtney Pickering vs Mina Chang / Leina Durkee3-6, 1-6
2026-04-17vs MEADOW STC 18AW2.5+A-DTLost 03
L#1 DoublesVaughan Woodson / Sabrina Shippey vs Aileen Burgoyne / Kelsey Tu3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMina Penna vs Kristen Steinert1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Hemkin / Ashley Brush vs Corrine Dugan / Tina Su1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings31 teams · Women 2.5+
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ROLLING HILLS 18AW2.5+A-DT91201022205
2MEADOW STC 18AW2.5+A-DT8223716172
3TIBURON PEN C 18AW2.5+A-DT73191123192
4SARATOGA CC 18AW2.5+A-DT7321925249
5CUESTA TC 18AW2.5+A-DT73191127243
6DIABLO CC 18AW2.5+A-DT73171328246
7SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 18AW2.5+A-DT73181228243
8UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 18AW2.5+A-DT73181229270
9MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW2.5+A-DT73171331272
10ALPINE HILLS 18AW2.5+A-DT64201024187
11BLACKHAWK CC 18AW2.5+A-DT64181225219
12LOS GATOS SR 18AW2.5+A-DT64171330278
13ALMADEN SR 18AW2.5+A-DT64151530248
14SLEEPY HOLLOW 18AW2.5+A-DT64181231237
15DIABLO CC 18AW2.5+B-DT64171331261
16PLEASANTON 18AW2.5+A-DT64151531251
17MORAGA CC 18AW2.5+B-DT64151534249
18BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW2.5+A-DT55181228249
19FREMONT HILLS CC 18AW2.5+A-DT55151534263
20SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 18AW2.5+A-DT55141635257
21MORAGA CC 18AW2.5+A-DT46131736261
22RUBY HILL GC 18AW2.5+A-DT46131736270
23FOOTHILLS TandS 18AW2.5+A-DT46121838280
24RAFAEL RC 18AW2.5+A-DT37121837265
25ROUND HILL CC 18AW2.5+A-DT37111940280
26ROUND HILL CC 18AW2.5+B-DT37102045323
27CROW CANYON CC 18AW2.5+A-DT19102043303
28MARIN CC 18AW2.5+A-DT1992143283
29LOS GATOS SR 18AW2.5+B-DT1982245303
30LADERA OAKS 18AW2.5+A-DT1972348314
31LOS ALTOS GCC 18AW2.5+A-DT1962449324

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Beth Chang
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Alexis Mapel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.64
Sabrina Shippey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Aimee Kish
published 3
2.60
Courtney Pickering
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.50
Vaughan Woodson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Audrey Mao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Katy Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Maureen Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Mina Penna
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.32
2.26
Elizabeth C Papay
published 2.5
Ashley Brush
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ashley Hemkin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lisah Kmet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Schmidt + Courtney Pickering303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Beth Chang
8W–5L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Alexis Mapel
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%<1%
2.65
Sabrina Shippey
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%14%86%
2.64
3
Aimee Kish
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
Courtney Pickering
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%22%78%
2.60
Vaughan Woodson
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
Audrey Mao
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
Katy Anderson
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%68%32%
2.44
Maureen Schmidt
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
0%88%12%
2.35
Mina Penna
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.33
Stephanie Sinclitico
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
Elizabeth C Papay
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Ashley Brush
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Ashley Hemkin
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lisah Kmet
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.