Teams

MORAGA CC 18AW2.5+A-DT

2026 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 2.5+

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings31 teams · Women 2.5+
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ROLLING HILLS 18AW2.5+A-DT91201022205
2MEADOW STC 18AW2.5+A-DT8223716172
3TIBURON PEN C 18AW2.5+A-DT73191123192
4SARATOGA CC 18AW2.5+A-DT7321925249
5CUESTA TC 18AW2.5+A-DT73191127243
6DIABLO CC 18AW2.5+A-DT73171328246
7SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 18AW2.5+A-DT73181228243
8UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 18AW2.5+A-DT73181229270
9MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW2.5+A-DT73171331272
10ALPINE HILLS 18AW2.5+A-DT64201024187
11BLACKHAWK CC 18AW2.5+A-DT64181225219
12LOS GATOS SR 18AW2.5+A-DT64171330278
13ALMADEN SR 18AW2.5+A-DT64151530248
14SLEEPY HOLLOW 18AW2.5+A-DT64181231237
15DIABLO CC 18AW2.5+B-DT64171331261
16PLEASANTON 18AW2.5+A-DT64151531251
17MORAGA CC 18AW2.5+B-DT64151534249
18BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW2.5+A-DT55181228249
19FREMONT HILLS CC 18AW2.5+A-DT55151534263
20SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 18AW2.5+A-DT55141635257
21MORAGA CC 18AW2.5+A-DT46131736261
22RUBY HILL GC 18AW2.5+A-DT46131736270
23FOOTHILLS TandS 18AW2.5+A-DT46121838280
24RAFAEL RC 18AW2.5+A-DT37121837265
25ROUND HILL CC 18AW2.5+A-DT37111940280
26ROUND HILL CC 18AW2.5+B-DT37102045323
27CROW CANYON CC 18AW2.5+A-DT19102043303
28MARIN CC 18AW2.5+A-DT1992143283
29LOS GATOS SR 18AW2.5+B-DT1982245303
30LADERA OAKS 18AW2.5+A-DT1972348314
31LOS ALTOS GCC 18AW2.5+A-DT1962449324

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Megan Buckley
published
3.01
Blaire Stokes
published 3
2.88
Bethany Peterson
published 3
2.87
Jin Sun Park
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Erin Garfin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.51
Meghan Donnelly
published
2.43
Mia May
published
2.32
Megan Appelblom
published
2.24
Amy Loos
published 2.5
2.11
Liping Zhang
published
Meghan Basso
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Buckley
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.10
3
Blaire Stokes
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Bethany Peterson
8W–2L career · type D · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Jin Sun Park
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.87
3
Erin Garfin
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Dominique Mickelson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Meghan Donnelly
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51
Mia May
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%70%30%
2.43
Megan Appelblom
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
Amy Loos
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
Liping Zhang
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Meghan Basso
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.