Teams

RMTC GOLD

2023 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 6.5 - ITA

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-13vs RMTC TEALLost 01
L#2 DoublesKyle Grage / Tsugumi Richards vs Darren Berns / Kathleen Fitzcallaghan2-6, 4-6
2023-08-12vs LTA-P GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Mason / Stuart Dimson vs Tanya Eisele / Jeff Rodanski0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPatti Dietz / Bill Dietz vs Jennifer Arndt / Mark Millican1-6, 1-6
2023-08-06vs BTA-C GOLDLost 02
L#1 DoublesStuart Dimson / Lori Mason vs Brian Opiyo / Alia Ghandour3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatti Dietz / Bill Dietz vs Joe Teasdale / Catherine Bryan2-6, 0-6
2023-07-30vs LTA-P GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesStuart Dimson / Tsugumi Richards vs Rob Arndt / Kris Graham6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-07-23vs FCCC PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesStuart Dimson / Tsugumi Richards vs Cameron Kawato / Karen Weller5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPatti Dietz / Bill Dietz vs David Shigekane / Tara Delaney1-6, 3-6
2023-07-09vs RMTC TEALWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatti Dietz / Bill Dietz vs Christy Valentine / Chris Valentine6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Tsugumi Richards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Bill Dietz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Stuart Dimson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Christy Roney
published 3
2.94
Patti Dietz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Lori Mason
published
2.64
Kyle Grage
published
2.25
Jackie Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bill Dietz + Patti Dietz111053% games+10.5% vs expected
Tsugumi Richards + Stuart Dimson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tsugumi Richards
68W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Bill Dietz
39W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Stuart Dimson
23W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Christy Roney
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Patti Dietz
32W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Lori Mason
14W–21L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
Kyle Grage
16W–21L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
Jackie Martin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.