Teams

FCCC PURPLE

2023 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 6.5 - ITA

15 players · average NTRP 3.06 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesJane Roberti / Joe Ostroski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-13vs BTA-C GOLDWon 10
W#1 DoublesDerek Metz / Jane Roberti vs Joe Teasdale / Catherine Bryan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-06vs LTA-P GREENLost 01
L#3 DoublesJane Schmelzle / Matt Morgan vs Gloria Andrews / Rob Arndt4-6, 3-6
2023-07-23vs RMTC GOLDWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Shigekane / Tara Delaney vs Patti Dietz / Bill Dietz6-1, 6-3
2023-07-09vs BTA-C GOLDLost 01
L#2 DoublesJane Roberti / Raghu Raj Prasanna Kumar vs Alia Ghandour / Joe Teasdale6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
David Shigekane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Stephanie Kemp
published
3.43
Jane Schmelzle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
3.16
Karen Weller
published
3.04
Cameron Kawato
published 3
2.93
Stephen Roberti
published
2.87
Tara Delaney
published
2.86
Joe Ostroski
published
2.82
Derek Metz
published 3
2.79
Deanna Verchick
published 3
2.79
Alison Morgan
published 3
2.63
Jane Roberti
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Christina Baker
published 2.5
Maria Irianni Renno
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Shigekane
69W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.55
Stephanie Kemp
15W–16L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Jane Schmelzle
68W–42L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
Raghu Raj Prasanna Kumar
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.27
Karen Weller
11W–28L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Cameron Kawato
19W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
Stephen Roberti
17W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
Tara Delaney
21W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
Joe Ostroski
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Derek Metz
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Deanna Verchick
22W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Alison Morgan
14W–22L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Jane Roberti
66W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
2.5
Christina Baker
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maria Irianni Renno
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.