Teams

Western: 40-LOVE

2026 18&Over Mixed · 8.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.92 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesJohns Hsieh / Allison Haynes vs Adam Lewczuk / Jennifer Sweet6-4, 6-2
2026-03-14vs BING: Net HackersWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Haynes / Johns Hsieh vs Evan Vail / Susan Vail6-3, 6-4
2026-02-07vs BING: Net HackersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohns Hsieh / Allison Haynes vs Evan Vail / Yelena Reporyeva4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-02-07vs Hit and RunWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Haynes / Johns Hsieh vs William Mendler / Tracy Sladish6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Johns Hsieh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.24
Joon Young Kim
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
4.11
Alex Vizgaitis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.07
Kurran Singh
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.00
Brianna Laureti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.96
Katelyn Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Brooke Tutor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Mizuho Okada
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.76
Nam-Jung Kim
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.74
Kuniko Okada
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Lizzie Barlow
published
3.68
Marcus J Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Norifumi Urao
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.53
Bong Gee Jang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Madi Maley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Wen Lin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alex Vizgaitis + Bong Gee Jang5158% gamesnot enough data
Wen Lin + Norifumi Urao3270% gamesnot enough data
Mizuho Okada + Kuniko Okada3263% gamesnot enough data
Joon Young Kim + Kuniko Okada224 matchesnot enough data
Katelyn Nguyen + Norifumi Urao303 matchesnot enough data
Wen Lin + Bong Gee Jang213 matchesnot enough data
Nam-Jung Kim + Madi Maley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Johns Hsieh
15W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
4.26
Joon Young Kim
111W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Alex Vizgaitis
105W–40L career · 6 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
4.11
Kurran Singh
47W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
Brianna Laureti
87W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Katelyn Nguyen
83W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Brooke Tutor
41W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.83
Mizuho Okada
47W–33L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Nam-Jung Kim
59W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
Kuniko Okada
35W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
Lizzie Barlow
60W–27L career · no lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.69
Marcus J Brooks
30W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Norifumi Urao
114W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.63
3.5
Bong Gee Jang
54W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
Madi Maley
39W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Wen Lin
89W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.