Teams

NWO 40&Over 4.0W Kuyama/Bloomquist-U of Findlay

2023 NWO Adult 40 & Over · NWO Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
L#1 DoublesShawna Dippman / Keyuko Kuyama vs Kathleen Hire / Amanda Paule3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesHallie Williams vs Hilary Hayden6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDebra Bloomquist / Gretchen Leu vs Donna Engel / Brenda Irwin2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKeyuko Kuyama / Susan Spragg vs Sarah Ward / Carrie Zanville4-6, 4-5
W#2 DoublesAmy Davis / Karen Hoban vs Janet Daniel / Angela Langevin6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDebra Bloomquist / Gretchen Leu vs Dawn Cameron / Mary Morrison6-3, 6-0
2023-07-18vs NWO 40&Over 4.0W Sanderson-SVCLost 03
L#1 DoublesShawna Dippman / Christina Tam vs Denise Nisbett / Elizabeth Wymer2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKeyuko Kuyama vs Julie Britton3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Spragg / Rachel Hepner Zawodny vs Emily Nixon / Andrea Wymer1-6, 0-6
2023-07-11vs NWO 40&Over 4.0W Ray/Wong-PTCWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmy Davis / Susan Spragg vs Rosanna Wong / Brenda Scott6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHallie Williams vs Hillary Anne Walters6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristina Tam / Melinda Murphy vs Keri Buff / Christine Gohr6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJane Heck / Keyuko Kuyama vs Mary Jo French / Jill Gauthier4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAmy Davis / Lisa Reichert vs Michele Flickinger / Melissa Hill6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesHallie Williams vs Julieann Campbell3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMelinda Murphy / Jane Heck vs Sara Johnson / Didi Thomason1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Bloomquist / Rachel Hepner Zawodny vs Dana Loeb / Theresa Vietmeier1-6, 4-6
2023-06-25vs NWO 40&Over 4.0W Riffer/Evans-PTCWon 40
W#1 DoublesJane Heck / Melinda Murphy vs Eileen Riffer / Jennifer Rimer4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHallie Williams vs Kate Krisjanis6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShawna Dippman / Keyuko Kuyama vs Julie Roe / Kelly Kessler6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRachel Hepner Zawodny / Karen Hoban vs Patricia Falk / Hyeyoung Bang6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-13vs NWO 40&Over 4.0W Riffer/Evans-PTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJane Heck / Susan Spragg vs Kristen Struffolino / Lisa Evans6-4, 4-3
W#1 SinglesKeyuko Kuyama vs Kate Krisjanis6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDebra Bloomquist / Rachel Hepner Zawodny vs Eileen Riffer / Kelly Kessler6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAmy Davis / Tracey Tangeman vs Tricia Smith / Kelly Carter4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHallie Williams vs Amanda Paule5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKeyuko Kuyama / Lisa Reichert vs Amy Young / Hilary Hayden6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGretchen Leu / Shawna Dippman vs Renisa Dorner / Rachel Barnett3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-30vs NWO 40&Over 4.0W Ward/Cameron -TTCLost 13
L#1 DoublesMelinda Murphy / Karen Hoban vs Dawn Cameron / Isobel Tracy6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHallie Williams vs Angela Langevin7-6, 3-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKeyuko Kuyama / Shawna Dippman vs Sarah Ward / Carrie Zanville3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Davis / Jane Heck vs Teri Hagemeyer / Diane Belinske6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-05-23vs NWO 40&Over 4.0W Sanderson-SVCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelinda Murphy / Tracey Tangeman vs Jen Sanderson / Andrea Wymer6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesShawna Dippman vs Mary Ann Holmes6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Hepner Zawodny / Lisa Reichert vs Emily Nixon / Christina Konz1-6, 0-6
2023-05-16vs NWO 40&Over 4.0W Ray/Wong-PTCWon 31
L#1 DoublesMelinda Murphy / Karen Hoban vs Jill Gauthier / Christine Gohr6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHallie Williams vs Brenda Scott6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Davis / Tracey Tangeman vs Hillary Anne Walters / Rosanna Wong6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShawna Dippman / Rachel Hepner Zawodny vs Jill Feltner / Mary Jo French6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMelinda Murphy / Christina Tam vs Michele Flickinger / Julieann Campbell2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKeyuko Kuyama vs Susan Stearns3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Davis / Lisa Reichert vs Dana Loeb / Melissa Hill6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShawna Dippman / Rachel Hepner Zawodny vs Didi Thomason / Sara Johnson2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NWO Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 40&Over 4.0W Sanderson-SVC111371132310
2NWO 40&Over 4.0W McCullough/Young-PTC102361233329
3NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb/Flickinger-TWOS84311743403
4NWO 40&Over 4.0W Kuyama/Bloomquist-U of Findlay57212759430
5NWO 40&Over 4.0W Ward/Cameron -TTC48163272498
6NWO 40&Over 4.0W Ray/Wong-PTC39192966497
7NWO 40&Over 4.0W Riffer/Evans-PTC11174188546

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Shawna Dippman
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
3.74
Lisa Reichert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.68
Keyuko Kuyama
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Susan Spragg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Christina Tam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Hallie Williams
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.26
Gretchen Leu
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.79
Debra Bloomquist
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jane Heck
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Karen Hoban
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Melinda Murphy
published
Rachel Hepner Zawodny
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Tracey Tangeman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Heck + Melinda Murphy5159% games−1.1% vs expected
Susan Spragg + Keyuko Kuyama3350% games−1.2% vs expected
Keyuko Kuyama + Christina Tam2444% games−4.7% vs expected
Shawna Dippman + Christina Tam9167% gamesnot enough data
Debra Bloomquist + Hallie Williams6162% gamesnot enough data
Karen Hoban + Melinda Murphy224 matchesnot enough data
Debra Bloomquist + Keyuko Kuyama044 matchesnot enough data
Debra Bloomquist + Rachel Hepner Zawodny044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shawna Dippman
187W–65L career · 14 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.78
Lisa Reichert
111W–129L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Keyuko Kuyama
174W–152L career · 9 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
Susan Spragg
92W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Christina Tam
109W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Hallie Williams
132W–82L career · 7 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Gretchen Leu
26W–34L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
3
Debra Bloomquist
74W–70L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.79
Jane Heck
41W–21L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Hoban
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melinda Murphy
31W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Hepner Zawodny
11W–17L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracey Tangeman
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.