Teams

CAC/SL-Silverados-Gascoigne

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-26vs BC-ClementeWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobert Gascoigne / Mariano Ortiz Jr vs Terry Lundeen / John Bell6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChris Lloyd / Daniel Murray vs James Tursa / Tom Clemente6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKim Henderson / AL King vs David Hasbrook / Paul Snyder2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-20vs RBW-Dodd 7.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesMariano Ortiz Jr / AL King vs Robert Coe / Larry Bienenfeld6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChris Lloyd / Daniel Murray vs David Pogue / Steve Lang3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesColin Bronemann / Kim Henderson vs Douglas Scott / Donald Shifrin7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-14vs NWW-MC-SatoLost 12
L#1 DoublesMariano Ortiz Jr / Mark Waldron vs Stuart Cobb / Frank Hammer3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChris Lloyd / Daniel Murray vs Honghue Hsu / Peter Sefton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoseph Ching / James Jovanovich vs Steve Eggerman / Seth Fulcher1-6, 1-6
2026-05-05vs FC-BarberWon 30
W#1 DoublesMariano Ortiz Jr / Mark Waldron vs Mario Hernandez / Thomas Stave6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAL King / Colin Bronemann vs Ron Atienza / Mike Helbach6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChris Lloyd / Daniel Murray vs Charles David Dizon / Mike Price6-0, 6-0
2026-04-28vs BC-ClementeWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Waldron / Mariano Ortiz Jr vs David McGinnis / Dan Morrison4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Murray / Chris Lloyd vs James Tursa / Clifford Weiss6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAL King / Kim Henderson vs Scott Manning / David Robinson7-6, 6-3
2026-04-22vs RBW-Dodd 7.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesMark Waldron / Martin Sullivan vs Terry Coe / Richard Bienenfeld6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesColin Bronemann / Chris Lloyd vs Larry Bienenfeld / Douglas Scott7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAL King / Kim Henderson vs David Pogue / Warren Yasutake4-6, 4-6
2026-04-21vs NWW-MC-SatoLost 12
W#1 DoublesMariano Ortiz Jr / Mark Waldron vs Frank Hammer / Peter Sefton7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesColin Bronemann / Chris Lloyd vs Steve Eggerman / Alvin Sato3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAL King / Kim Henderson vs Michael Carlson / Seth Fulcher4-6, 6-7
2026-04-14vs HBSQ-Henninger/StrongWon 30
W#1 DoublesMariano Ortiz Jr / Mark Waldron vs Mark Henninger / Jerry Isen6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJoseph Ching / Chris Lloyd vs William Manson / Bruce Ludwig6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Gascoigne / AL King vs Nicholas Sherman / STEPHEN WAUGH6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Daniel Murray
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.59
Joseph Ching
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.36
Mariano Ortiz Jr
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Robert Gascoigne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
AL King
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.18
Martin Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Mark Waldron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Kim Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Colin Bronemann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.85
Chris Lloyd
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.66
James Jovanovich
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Waldron + Martin Sullivan4260% games+12.7% vs expected
Mark Waldron + Mariano Ortiz Jr6354% games+2.2% vs expected
James Jovanovich + Joseph Ching4552% gamesnot enough data
Colin Bronemann + Chris Lloyd0836% gamesnot enough data
Robert Gascoigne + Martin Sullivan4455% gamesnot enough data
Colin Bronemann + Mariano Ortiz Jr5257% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Ching + Robert Gascoigne1545% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Murray + Chris Lloyd4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Murray
43W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Joseph Ching
44W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Mariano Ortiz Jr
142W–73L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Robert Gascoigne
35W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
AL King
67W–64L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Martin Sullivan
59W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Mark Waldron
92W–98L career · 6 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Kim Henderson
24W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Colin Bronemann
32W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Chris Lloyd
10W–31L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
James Jovanovich
60W–68L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.