Teams

Double Dippers

2024 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Lucia Parker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Heather Selis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Deborah Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDeborah Cohen / Heather Selis vs Stephnie Bonn / Deanna McKay7-6, 6-4
2024-08-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesDeborah Cohen / Kate Quisling vs Kristin Morris / Ilona Vondolovski3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Quisling / Deborah Cohen vs Amy Pickens / Vanessa Weber6-0, 7-5
2024-07-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Quisling / Heather Selis vs Kara Petracca / Jocelyn Smith4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLucia Parker / Heather Selis vs Genevieve Rollier / Dana Nolan6-2, 6-2
2024-07-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Selis / Kate Quisling vs Dar Dragoon / Chelsea Place5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-06-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesLucia Parker / Kate Quisling vs Nichole Dewson / Laura Baughman6-0, 6-0
2024-06-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesLucia Parker / Heather Selis vs Emma Chait / Anna Tsoi7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Lucia Parker
50W–35L career
0%63%37%
3.07
3
Heather Selis
35W–60L career
0%84%16%
2.97
3
Deborah Cohen
65W–38L career
0%99%1%
2.81

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.