Teams

DTC #3

2021 NTA SUMMER LEAGUE · 3.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-24vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSSplit 11
W#1 Male SinglesPej Sabet vs Stu Engs6-1, 6-0
L#3 Male DoublesDavid Fultz / Ed McDougall vs Jordan Raub / Adam Austin2-6, 3-6
2021-08-17vs SPANISH TRAILWon 20
W#1 Male SinglesPej Sabet vs Brian Kolp6-1, 6-3
W#3 Male DoublesEd McDougall / David Fultz vs Jared Overholtzer / Brandon Roper6-3, 6-4
2021-08-10vs DTC #2Won 10
W#1 Male SinglesPej Sabet vs Lee Fine6-3, 6-0
2021-08-03vs RED ROCK CCWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesEd McDougall / Don Dennis vs Dale Haines / Ali Hamraz6-2, 6-4
W#1 Male SinglesPej Sabet vs Nick Binger6-4, 6-4
2021-07-27vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVLost 01
L#1 Male SinglesEd McDougall vs Ricky Riopta2-6, 4-6
2021-07-20vs TPCSplit 11
L#1 Male DoublesEd McDougall / Don Dennis vs John To / Edgar Munoz de Rueda3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 Male DoublesDavid Fultz / Pej Sabet vs Benjamin Lengson / Andrew Glendon7-6, 6-4
2021-07-13vs DTC #1Lost 01
L#1 Male SinglesEd McDougall vs Brady Stevens3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-07-06vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSLost 02
L#1 Male DoublesEd McDougall / Johnny Underwood vs Stu Engs / Benjamin Kott1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 Male DoublesPej Sabet / David Fultz vs Jordan Raub / Wael Eid3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Pej Sabet
usually #1 Male Singles 67%, also #3 Male Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.96
Johnny Underwood
published
2.89
Ed McDougall
usually #3 Male Doubles 44%, also #1 Male Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Don Dennis
published 3
2.55
Joseph Bancheri
published
David Fultz
published
Jesus Quinonez
published
Matthew Holdaway
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Johnny Underwood + Matthew Holdaway6358% games+6.6% vs expected
Ed McDougall + Pej Sabet224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Pej Sabet
67W–38L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Johnny Underwood
135W–120L career · no lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
2.96
3.5
Ed McDougall
85W–68L career · 9 lines in 2021
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
Don Dennis
38W–50L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Joseph Bancheri
6W–36L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
2.55
David Fultz
5W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jesus Quinonez
3W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Matthew Holdaway
33W–21L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.