Teams

TPC

2021 NTA SUMMER LEAGUE · 3.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-08-31vs DTC #2Won 20
W#1 Male DoublesBenjamin Lengson / Timothy Tuong vs JOHN CHAMSI / Roger Guzman6-2, 6-2
W#3 Male DoublesAndrew Glendon / Bret Loughridge vs Paul Scott / Antonio Ventura6-0, 6-2
2021-08-24vs DTC #1Split 11
W#1 Male DoublesBenjamin Lengson / Mike Burgoyne vs Thomas Standish / Josh Haldeman6-2, 6-2
L#2 Male DoublesBOB MARSHALL / Andrew Glendon vs Bradley Clemmer / Brian Brancato3-6, 5-7
2021-08-17vs RED ROCK CCWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesBenjamin Lengson / Mike Burgoyne vs Dale Haines / Michael Brewington6-1, 6-2
W#3 Male DoublesAndrew Glendon / BOB MARSHALL vs Nicholas Vernetti / Ali Hamraz4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-08-10vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSLost 01
L#3 Male DoublesEdgar Munoz de Rueda / Andrew Glendon vs Adam Austin / Matthew Gayheart3-6, 5-7
2021-08-03vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVLost 01
L#2 Male DoublesAndrew Glendon / Bret Loughridge vs Ryan Popowcer / Derrick Hunter2-6, 4-6
2021-07-27vs SPANISH TRAILLost 01
L#3 Male DoublesAndrew Glendon / Nicholas Hansen vs Dan Michalski / Brandon Roper4-6, 1-6
2021-07-20vs DTC #3Lost 01
L#2 Male DoublesBenjamin Lengson / Andrew Glendon vs David Fultz / Pej Sabet6-7, 4-6
2021-07-13vs DTC #2Won 10
W#2 Male DoublesBenjamin Lengson / Mike Burgoyne vs JOHN CHAMSI / Bruce M Floyd6-0, 6-1
2021-07-06vs DTC #1Won 10
W#3 Male DoublesAndrew Glendon / Bret Loughridge vs James Campbell / Jim Olizarowicz6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
John To
published
2.79
Benjamin Lengson
usually #3 Male Doubles 50%, also #1 Male Doubles 30% · published 3
Andrew Glendon
usually #3 Male Doubles 63%, also #2 Male Doubles 38% · published 3
BOB MARSHALL
published 3
2.67
Nicholas Hansen
published
2.48
Abraham Ibarra
published 3
Mike Burgoyne
published
Timothy Tuong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Tuong + John To314 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin Lengson + John To213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John To
107W–56L career · no lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.51
3
Benjamin Lengson
130W–96L career · 10 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Andrew Glendon
64W–56L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
BOB MARSHALL
11W–35L career · type A · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nicholas Hansen
28W–28L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Abraham Ibarra
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
2.48
Mike Burgoyne
14W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Timothy Tuong
10W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.