← Search

Andrew Glendon

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
120 matches · 64W–56L · seasons 2020–2025
Where Andrew sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Andrew is one of 683 men at 3.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 23% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Andrew has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Andrew has gone from the 63rd to the 82nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
58.1%
43W–31L · 55.3% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 43.4% of games
5.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 54.5% of games
6.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 53.6% of games
6.5mixed
25%
3W–9L · 40.9% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history120 matches
W
Michael Reynolds / Leonard Greenchamps
2025-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Michael Dali
+0.013better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Thad Smith / Jeff Hendersonchamps
2025-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Dali
+0.001about as expected — took 52% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
STEPHANE BIRY / James Mcclary
2025-07-24 · #3 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Pursel
−0.006below expectation — took 35% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Michael Miller / Robert E Kinsey
2025-07-10 · #3 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Dali
+0.062better than expected — took 68% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
Matthew Cinelli / Antonio Venturachamps
2025-06-17 · #1 Doubles · with Alan Mcgrath
−0.009below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Marc Saggese / Mike Baraiolo
2025-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Dali
−0.005about as expected — took 62% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Matthew Cinelli / Jared Overholtzer
2025-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alan Mcgrath
+0.061better than expected — took 75% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
David Dellett / Terry Hulse
2025-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Johnny Underwood
+0.027better than expected — took 92% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Darren Rouvi / Brian Brancatochamps
2025-04-08 · #3 Doubles · with Paul Marrero
−0.027below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-04-07 · #2 Doubles · with Paul Marrero
+0.022better than expected — took 47% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Cary Carter / Robert Bravin
2025-04-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Marrero
−0.021below expectation — took 52% of games against 59% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
JOHN CHAMSI / James Izeluk
2025-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Dali
−0.016below expectation — took 57% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.