Teams

BRMST BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-03vs RCC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Sinsel / Dan Golden vs Jeffrey Galloway / Kurt Ronacher2-6, 4-6
2022-05-17vs NJ GREENWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharlie Belton / Dan Golden vs Tim Doherty / Kevin Thistle6-4, 6-2
2022-05-10vs LTA NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesDan Golden / Andrew Sinsel vs Daniel Ohlsen / Justin Oberndorf6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-03vs BTA REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Sinsel / Dan Golden vs John Nevins / John Viloria3-6, 5-7
2022-04-26vs TTA BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesRussell Hogan / Scott Kuhna vs Toua Vang / Mario Dominguez4-6, 3-6
2022-04-19vs RMTC NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesRussell Hogan / John Stewart vs Graham Carlson / Brent Schmierbach6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Paul Billings
published
3.33
Dan Golden
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Andrew Sinsel
published 3.5
Christian Booton
published 3.5
3.21
Russell Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Robert Tedesco
published
Dean Booton
published 2.5
Charlie Belton
published
Perry May
published
Scott Kuhna
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Sinsel + Robert Tedesco6452% games−0.9% vs expected
Russell Hogan + Dan Golden4453% games−3.8% vs expected
Robert Tedesco + Russell Hogan5356% games−5.9% vs expected
Robert Tedesco + Dan Golden4165% gamesnot enough data
Scott Kuhna + Dean Booton0535% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Sinsel + Russell Hogan314 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Sinsel + Dan Golden224 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Sinsel + Perry May123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Billings
61W–36L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Dan Golden
45W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Andrew Sinsel
35W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Christian Booton
6W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Russell Hogan
46W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Robert Tedesco
41W–48L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
2.5
Dean Booton
9W–25L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Charlie Belton
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Perry May
5W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Kuhna
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.