Teams

NJ GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-24vs MEA REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesRobert Dallenbach vs Nick Talocco6-2, 6-0
2022-05-17vs BRMST BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesJonathan Hall / Robert Dallenbach vs Andrew Sinsel / John Stewart6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTim Doherty / Kevin Thistle vs Charlie Belton / Dan Golden4-6, 2-6
2022-05-10vs BTA REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesTim Doherty / Kevin Thistle vs Parker Dodd / Charles Hoffman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-04vs RMTC NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesEd Hedberg / Kevin Thistle vs Jonathan Bocina / Adam Kemp6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-26vs RCC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesKevin Thistle / Peter Malouff vs John Demaray / Kurt Ronacher6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-19vs LTA NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesKevin Thistle / Tim Doherty vs Long Tran / Shijung Kim5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Roger Phillips
published
3.18
Brian Messer
published 3.5
3.18
Kevin Thistle
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Robert Dallenbach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Tom Merkert
published
3.00
Paul Angelino
published
2.90
John Hamilton
published
Ed Hedberg
published
Peter Malouff
published
Tim Doherty
published
WC Ackerman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Merkert + Paul Angelino71246% games−1.5% vs expected
John Hamilton + Kevin Thistle5838% games−11.5% vs expected
John Hamilton + Tim Doherty044 matchesnot enough data
John Hamilton + Peter Malouff224 matchesnot enough data
Brian Messer + Kevin Thistle224 matchesnot enough data
WC Ackerman + Peter Malouff314 matchesnot enough data
WC Ackerman + Tom Merkert314 matchesnot enough data
John Hamilton + Paul Angelino033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roger Phillips
30W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Brian Messer
40W–50L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Kevin Thistle
90W–113L career · 5 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Robert Dallenbach
37W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Tom Merkert
26W–20L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Paul Angelino
17W–29L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.00
John Hamilton
11W–21L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.90
Ed Hedberg
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Malouff
19W–38L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tim Doherty
12W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
WC Ackerman
27W–31L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.