Teams

SAZ/Cunningham/18&Over3.0W

Adult 18 & OVER LEAGUE · 3.0 Women's

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-13vs La PalomaWon 31
W#1 DoublesLinda Barrows / Kristina Burdine vs Natalie Carey / Keri Casper6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTrina Callie / Mary Palazzo vs Michelle Nagel / Elizabeth Watson6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMariya D Varavva vs Dahlia Bowden6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesOlympia Tinsley / Mi Jin Kim-Ley vs Sheila Hanley / Stephanee Adams6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-04-29vs TCC 3.0Won 40
W#1 DoublesKristina Burdine / Mary Palazzo vs Patrice Busch / Kelly Wentzel6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Stern vs Alexis Munger6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Barrows / JANET UTECHT vs Suezie Kim / Alison Sullivan6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMariya D Varavva vs Rachel Black6-0, 6-0
2022-04-23vs NP- WomenSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKristina Burdine / Mary Palazzo vs Caryn Barman / Elaine Overlund6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJANET UTECHT / Amy Beiter vs Janice Igarashi / Dee Buizer2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSarah Stern vs Holly Monka6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesOlympia Tinsley / Mi Jin Kim-Ley vs Rebecca Block / Melissa Haskin6-2, 6-1
2022-04-15vs La PalomaWon 40
W#1 DoublesMary Palazzo / Sarah Stern vs Keri Casper / Michelle Nagel6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTrina Callie / Olympia Tinsley vs Monica Tapia Barcelo / Dana Goldstein6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesMariya D Varavva vs Elyse Robb6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Beiter / JANET UTECHT vs Callie LeRoy / Tracy Rea6-0, 6-2
2022-04-09vs TCC 3.0Won 40
W#1 DoublesLinda Barrows / Mary Palazzo vs Rachel Black / Patrice Busch6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJANET UTECHT / Amy Beiter vs Suezie Kim / Manisha Narasimhan6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMariya D Varavva vs Alexis Munger6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTrina Callie / Sarah Stern vs Kanchana Narendran / Monica Vargas6-1, 6-1
2022-04-02vs NP- WomenWon 40
W#1 DoublesLinda Barrows / Mary Palazzo vs Caryn Barman / Dee Buizer7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJANET UTECHT / Amy Beiter vs Janice Igarashi / Terri Marshburn6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSarah Stern vs Sherry Downer6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTrina Callie / Mi Jin Kim-Ley vs Melissa Haskin / Rebecca Block6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Women's
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAZ/Cunningham/18&Over3.0W602649144
2NP- Women2492143293
3TCC 3.00662451318

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Mariya D Varavva
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.33
Mary Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.21
Trina Callie
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
3.17
Sarah Stern
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
3.07
Mi Jin Kim-Ley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Kristina Burdine
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.95
Amy Beiter
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Linda Barrows
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.91
Mary Palazzo
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.85
Kate G Green
published
2.84
Olympia Tinsley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
JANET UTECHT
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Palazzo + Amy Beiter7166% games+9.3% vs expected
Mi Jin Kim-Ley + Olympia Tinsley6359% games+9.2% vs expected
Amy Beiter + JANET UTECHT8363% games+3.8% vs expected
Mary Palazzo + Linda Barrows5354% games−13.6% vs expected
Mi Jin Kim-Ley + Linda Barrows4360% gamesnot enough data
Mary Palazzo + Olympia Tinsley3344% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Stern + Olympia Tinsley3248% gamesnot enough data
Trina Callie + Kristina Burdine224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mariya D Varavva
76W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50
Mary Cunningham
56W–96L career · 10 lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
Trina Callie
48W–90L career · 8 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Sarah Stern
46W–58L career · 7 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Mi Jin Kim-Ley
53W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.07
Kristina Burdine
55W–59L career · 7 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Amy Beiter
41W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
Linda Barrows
67W–101L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.94
Mary Palazzo
49W–32L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
Kate G Green
48W–93L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
Olympia Tinsley
65W–60L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
JANET UTECHT
31W–52L career · 9 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.