Teams

TCC 3.0

Adult 18 & OVER LEAGUE · 3.0 Women's

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-07vs NP- WomenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnnie Dirk / Alexis Munger vs Dee Buizer / Carole Butler6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRachel Black / Alison Sullivan vs Rebecca Block / Melissa Haskin2-6, 2-6
2022-04-29vs SAZ/Cunningham/18&Over3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatrice Busch / Kelly Wentzel vs Kristina Burdine / Mary Palazzo4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAlexis Munger vs Sarah Stern2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSuezie Kim / Alison Sullivan vs Linda Barrows / JANET UTECHT4-6, 1-6
2022-04-23vs La PalomaLost 12
W#1 DoublesKelly Wentzel / Patrice Busch vs Natalie Carey / Jill DeBake6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Black / Alison Sullivan vs Sheila Hanley / Wendy Smotherman3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSenait Dyson vs Dahlia Bowden4-6, 2-6
2022-04-16vs NP- WomenLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Wentzel / Patrice Busch vs Janice Igarashi / Terri Marshburn4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAlexis Munger vs Carole Butler6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-09vs SAZ/Cunningham/18&Over3.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesRachel Black / Patrice Busch vs Linda Barrows / Mary Palazzo1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAlexis Munger vs Mariya D Varavva0-6, 4-6
2022-04-01vs La PalomaLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Wentzel / Patrice Busch vs Jill DeBake / Linda Arnaud1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesManisha Narasimhan / Alison Sullivan vs Elizabeth Watson / Stephanee Adams2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAlexis Munger vs Holly Knutson0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Women's
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAZ/Cunningham/18&Over3.0W602649144
2NP- Women2492143293
3TCC 3.00662451318

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Alexis Munger
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Annie Dirk
published 3
2.48
Patrice Busch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Alison Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Bryan Dirk
published
Senait Dyson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrice Busch + Alison Sullivan0727% games−4.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alexis Munger
30W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3
Annie Dirk
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patrice Busch
3W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
3
Alison Sullivan
1W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.42
Bryan Dirk
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Senait Dyson
24W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.