Teams

Landis/Shaver/LR/Reb

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over · 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-12vs Szeto/RebsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoe Shaver / Lanny Landis vs Patrick Szeto / James Davenport4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGerald New / Jason Bennett vs John Ramsay / Roger Weldon6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCraig Lair / Greg Engstrom vs Steven Ransdell / Jess Griffin6-0, 6-4
2025-08-06vs Pinter/LR/RebsWon 21
L#1 DoublesLanny Landis / Joe Shaver vs Derrick Wilson / Adam Raines3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCraig Lair / Jason Bennett vs Michael Castens / Tay Sisoukrath6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGreg Engstrom / Christopher Stewart vs Ryan Allmond / Michael Shepherd2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-03vs Pinter/LR/RebsWon 20
W#2 DoublesJason Bennett / Gerald New vs Michael Castens / Landon Davis6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCraig Lair / Christopher Stewart vs Charlie Roberts / Cheiko Stewart6-3, 6-3
2025-07-21vs Szeto/RebsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Bryant / Gerald New vs Michael McGrew / Johnnie Ross7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-17vs Pinter/LR/RebsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesGerald New / James Bryant vs Charlie Roberts / Nathan Bender6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTimothy Carr / Lanny Landis vs John Slaughter / Derrick Wilson7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2025-07-01vs Szeto/RebsWon 21
L#1 DoublesLanny Landis / Joe Shaver vs Patrick Szeto / Michael McGrew3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJames Bryant / Gerald New vs Roger Weldon / James Davenport4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCraig Lair / Brian Anderson vs Steven Ransdell / Jess Griffin6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Joe Shaver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Gerald New
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Lanny Landis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.49
Jason Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Wade Anderson
published
James Bryant
published 3.5
3.12
Craig Lair
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Greg Engstrom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Bennett + Gerald New7168% games+14.9% vs expected
Wade Anderson + Gerald New7358% games+8.5% vs expected
Joe Shaver + Lanny Landis4547% games−11.6% vs expected
Wade Anderson + Jason Bennett314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joe Shaver
32W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Gerald New
50W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Lanny Landis
26W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
Jason Bennett
52W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Wade Anderson
28W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
James Bryant
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Craig Lair
27W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Greg Engstrom
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Christopher Stewart
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.