Teams

Pinter/LR/Rebs

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-20vs Szeto/RebsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDerrick Wilson / Rick O'Keefe vs James Davenport / Chris Stevens6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichael Castens / Mark Jaeger vs Johnnie Ross / Michael McGrew1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCharlie Roberts / Ryan Allmond vs James Harkins / Steven Ransdell6-4, 6-3
2025-07-29vs Szeto/RebsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDerrick Wilson / John Slaughter vs James Davenport / Chris Stevens6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRick O'Keefe / Mark Jaeger vs Johnnie Ross / Michael McGrew4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMartinez Dupree / Ryan Allmond vs James Harkins / Bryan Turriff4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-09vs Szeto/RebsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDerrick Wilson / John Slaughter vs James Davenport / Chris Stevens6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTay Sisoukrath / Nathan Bender vs John Ramsay / Roger Weldon2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRyan Allmond / Cheiko Stewart vs Bryan Turriff / James Harkins2-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Derrick Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Adam Raines
published 4
3.73
Rick O'Keefe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
John Slaughter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Ryan Allmond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Landon Davis
published
3.37
Nathan Bender
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Michael Castens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Charlie Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Cheiko Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.19
Eric Pinter
published
3.04
Tay Sisoukrath
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Martinez Dupree
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Jaeger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Landon Davis + Derrick Wilson7458% games+4.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Derrick Wilson
32W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Adam Raines
22W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Rick O'Keefe
33W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
John Slaughter
20W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Ryan Allmond
28W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
Landon Davis
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Nathan Bender
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.37
Michael Castens
18W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Charlie Roberts
28W–20L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Cheiko Stewart
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Eric Pinter
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Tay Sisoukrath
15W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Martinez Dupree
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Mark Jaeger
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.