Teams

Leach/Cammack 18+ ES23

2023 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 4.0 WOMEN

15 players · average NTRP 3.86 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-14vs Toleu/Huff: 4.0ever Young 18+ ES23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTina Mcalpine / Kathie Clark vs Andrea Boado / Shae Rohling3-6, 2-6
2022-12-13vs Wolson: Swingers 18+ ES23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKathie Clark / Tina Mcalpine vs Elizabeth Carlisle / Elizabeth Kruse2-6, 0-6
2022-11-15vs Reiling/Stout 4.0 18+ ES23Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathie Clark / Tina Mcalpine vs Sarah Twedt / Jillian Hultgren7-6, 6-4
2022-11-08vs Ouyang/Pjevach 18+ ES23Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathie Clark / Tina Mcalpine vs Julie Ouyang / Michelle Stein6-2, 6-4
2022-11-01vs Wolson: Swingers 18+ ES23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTina Mcalpine / Amy Senkowski vs Elizabeth Kruse / Elizabeth Carlisle5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-10-11Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTina Mcalpine vs Allyson Wolff0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Amy Larsen
published 4
3.78
Anne Cammack
published 4
3.75
Rebecca Cantwell
published
3.73
Margaret Creighton
published
3.70
Tina Mcalpine
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.68
Christine Leach
published 4
3.65
Carissa Knutson
published 4
3.58
Michelle Buron
published
3.58
Chanda Cook
published 4
3.51
Kathie Clark
published
3.42
Carol Forsythe
published 3.5
3.42
Donna Sommerfeldt
published
3.19
Ann Gabrielli
published 3.5
Michele Hirsch
published
Sally Gilchrist
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Forsythe + Chanda Cook5647% games+12.5% vs expected
Anne Cammack + Christine Leach5154% games+1.5% vs expected
Amy Larsen + Tina Mcalpine303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Larsen
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Anne Cammack
28W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Rebecca Cantwell
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Margaret Creighton
45W–47L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Tina Mcalpine
95W–72L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Christine Leach
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Carissa Knutson
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Michelle Buron
23W–22L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Chanda Cook
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Kathie Clark
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Carol Forsythe
29W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.42
Donna Sommerfeldt
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Ann Gabrielli
24W–22L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Michele Hirsch
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sally Gilchrist
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.