Teams

Maroon/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 2.5 Women FRI AM

11 players · average NTRP 2.60 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-04vs Geng/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Maroon / Orly Cohen vs Anne Ammons / Monica Kenny6-4, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMonique Raub vs Casey Brockett6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlix Cross / Alex Barron vs Natalie Geng / Jo Helen Smith2-6, 1-6
2024-11-20vs Russell/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesOrly Cohen / Christine Maroon vs Grace van Winkle / Marcy Mickiewicz6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMonique Raub vs Toni Kim6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHailey Pierson / Mary Morgan Holley vs Alicia Herrera / Catherine Pham6-2, 6-4
2024-11-18vs Madson/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Morgan Holley / Hailey Pierson vs Taylor Duncan / Nicole Gresham6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristine Maroon / Katy Miller vs Lauren O'Brien / Andrea Madson5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesShelby Greene / Olga Jacobsen vs Dianne Garland / Aden Hardison1-6, 2-6
2024-11-06vs Carlson/Flury/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesOrly Cohen / Christine Maroon vs Lauren Carlson / Lynde Easterlin Pontius6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesBina Patel vs Margaret Bourland1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMary Morgan Holley / Hailey Pierson vs Rebecca Gilliland / Rebecca Shah6-0, 6-0
2024-10-30vs Buie/Babcock/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaroline Malone / Alex Barron vs Crayton Wells / Erin Schorkopf4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAlix Cross vs Julie Rousseau6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Morgan Holley / Olga Jacobsen vs Maggie Owens / Rachel Babcock6-0, 6-1
2024-10-23vs Geng/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesHailey Pierson / Mary Morgan Holley vs Anne Ammons / Jill Labetti6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMonique Raub vs Casey Brockett6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Maroon / Orly Cohen vs Anna Morgan Crawford / Caitlin Foote4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-16vs Russell/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlex Barron / Tess Huggins vs Marcy Mickiewicz / Katy Miller4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesOrly Cohen vs Jennifer Mui5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMonique Raub / Bina Patel vs Whitney Kemp / Alexa Zylstra6-4, 7-6
2024-09-30vs Protz/Kim/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesHailey Pierson / Shelby Greene vs Laurel Dortch / Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMonique Raub / Orly Cohen vs Ahra Kim / Clair Bartholomew2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMary Morgan Holley vs Elizabeth Stanley3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Maroon / Rachel Loeffler vs Sherri Jones / Ryoko Yamanobe5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Mary Morgan Holley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Christine Maroon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Hailey Pierson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.54
Olga Jacobsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Orly Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.32
Alix Cross
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.30
Tess Huggins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
Alex Barron
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.10
Caroline Malone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.10
Bina Patel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Monique Raub
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Maroon + Orly Cohen4549% games+8.8% vs expected
Tess Huggins + Alex Barron4452% games+8.1% vs expected
Alex Barron + Caroline Malone5747% games−2.9% vs expected
Christine Maroon + Mary Morgan Holley404 matchesnot enough data
Mary Morgan Holley + Hailey Pierson404 matchesnot enough data
Orly Cohen + Mary Morgan Holley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Morgan Holley
14W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Christine Maroon
12W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Hailey Pierson
9W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Olga Jacobsen
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Orly Cohen
13W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Alix Cross
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
Tess Huggins
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Alex Barron
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Caroline Malone
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Bina Patel
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Monique Raub
6W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.