Teams

Protz/Kim/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 3.0 Women - Monday AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-18vs Stephens/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesStephanie Protz / Sherri Givens vs Amelia Stephens / Natalie Geng6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAshwini Kashelikar vs Stephanie Hill5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Frawley / Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy vs Madeline Long / Barbara Zwerner6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesClair Bartholomew vs Cara Adams6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLaurel Dortch / Elizabeth Stanley vs Jill Labetti / Sarah Corbin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-11vs Cox/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesPatricia Frawley / Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy vs Katye Hughes / Kelli Haywood6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesClair Bartholomew vs Erin Neal4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Protz / Sherri Givens vs Joy Cox / Elizabeth Davis2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAshwini Kashelikar vs Sarah Angus6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Stanley / Laurel Dortch vs Amy Frankel Nau / Lele Thompson6-4, 6-2
2024-11-05vs Monte/Spittle/NashvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesPatricia Frawley / Sherri Jones vs Blair Herrod / Jennifer Frankel6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesClair Bartholomew vs Allison Varble6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAshwini Kashelikar / Laurel Dortch vs Lesa Monte / Jessie Seaman6-0, 7-5
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Stanley vs Jess Lee6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAhra Kim / Meghan Lancaster vs Laura Monesmith / Jennifer Mui6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-28vs Kumar/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesKelly Kirby-Piovarcy / Patricia Frawley vs Susan Gillis / Karie Humphrey6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesClair Bartholomew vs Cara Alexander6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephanie Protz / Sherri Givens vs Megan de la O / Victoria Marcella6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAshwini Kashelikar vs Nina Kumar5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAhra Kim / Sherri Jones vs Elisa Hill / Kelly Dawson1-6, 1-6
2024-10-14vs Madson/NashvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesKristin Merrill / Sherri Givens vs Bianca Soma / Rochelle Garlow6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesStephanie Protz vs Megan King5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAhra Kim / Meghan Lancaster vs Andrea Madson / Lauren O'Brien6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesPatricia Frawley vs Daria Sharova6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesClaire Martin / Ryoko Yamanobe vs Patti Holzer / Dianne Garland6-4, 6-2
2024-09-30vs Maroon/NashvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesLaurel Dortch / Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy vs Hailey Pierson / Shelby Greene6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAshwini Kashelikar vs Amy Beno7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAhra Kim / Clair Bartholomew vs Monique Raub / Orly Cohen6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Stanley vs Mary Morgan Holley6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSherri Jones / Ryoko Yamanobe vs Christine Maroon / Rachel Loeffler7-5, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Laurel Dortch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Patricia Frawley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.21
Clair Bartholomew
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Sherri Givens
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Stephanie Protz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Ashwini Kashelikar
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.80
Sherri Jones
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.80
Ahra Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Elizabeth Stanley
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kristin Merrill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Meghan Lancaster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ryoko Yamanobe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Stanley + Laurel Dortch7556% games+5.9% vs expected
Stephanie Protz + Sherri Givens4167% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy + Stephanie Protz303 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy + Patricia Frawley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurel Dortch
13W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
Patricia Frawley
41W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Clair Bartholomew
18W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Sherri Givens
15W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy
29W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Stephanie Protz
29W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Ashwini Kashelikar
17W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Sherri Jones
14W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Ahra Kim
15W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Elizabeth Stanley
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Kristin Merrill
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Meghan Lancaster
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryoko Yamanobe
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.