Teams

KC-CC PURPLE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-07vs WC ORANGELost 01
L#1 SinglesErin Barnett vs Margaret Wilson2-6, 2-6
2023-08-31vs LTFC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLenora Louie Phelps / Candi Carpenito vs Ki Kellen / Colleen Frank1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Grace / Karla Elliot vs Natalia Isabel Camera Perez / Amy Chase6-3, 6-2
2023-08-24vs SS-D GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesKarla Elliot / Erin Barnett vs Martha Riley / Ann Baldwin6-4, 6-3
2023-08-17vs GCC NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Barnett / Beth Day vs Shannon Johnson / Michelle Belitz1-6, 1-6
2023-08-10vs PH YELLOWWon 10
W#2 DoublesKarla Elliot / Erin Barnett vs Casey Hemphill / Deanna Deorio7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-03vs KC-CC BLACKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKarla Elliot / Debra West vs Jessica Cleary / Alison Ellerbroek7-6, 6-0
L#1 SinglesErin Barnett vs Hatsady McCormick6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-27vs HFII BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesKarla Elliot / Debra West vs DNita Andrews / Kristi Piazza6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLenora Louie Phelps / Candi Carpenito vs Clare Ambrose / Sandra Stephenson6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
3.82
Stephanie Grace
published
3.82
Karla Elliot
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Debra West
published 4
3.79
Lenora Louie Phelps
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Erin Barnett
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Candi Carpenito
published 4
3.75
Cara Owen
published 4
3.72
Beth Day
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Day + Lenora Louie Phelps4354% games+6.1% vs expected
Karla Elliot + Lenora Louie Phelps181453% games+0.8% vs expected
Stephanie Wiesing + Beth Day7748% games−5.8% vs expected
Stephanie Grace + Beth Day1441% games−18.9% vs expected
Beth Day + Karla Elliot213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Wiesing
86W–43L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.88
Stephanie Grace
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Karla Elliot
124W–63L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Debra West
28W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Lenora Louie Phelps
83W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Erin Barnett
91W–46L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Candi Carpenito
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Cara Owen
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Beth Day
19W–24L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.