Teams

SS-D GREEN

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-07vs HFII BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacy Dent / Ann Olson vs Joy Coulter-Brown / Julie Sanders7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVirginia Reichert vs Sandra Stephenson1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLana Pierce / Martha Riley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-31vs WC ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesMartha Riley / Lana Pierce vs Kaitlyn Bridgers / Jamelle Leyden2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesVirginia Reichert vs Margaret Wilson4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Olson / Stacy Dent vs Andrea Milanovich / Kate Mayoss6-3, 6-3
2023-08-24vs KC-CC PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesJan McCaffrey / Lana Pierce vs Stephanie Wiesing / Cara Owen0-6, 4-6
2023-08-17vs LTFC GREENLost 02
L#1 SinglesVirginia Reichert vs Mary Brennan3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJan McCaffrey / Stacy Dent vs Jennifer Solimene / Tracy Brunschwig1-6, 1-6
2023-08-10vs GCC NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesVirginia Reichert / Joanie Fowler vs Michelle Belitz / Jami Hawkins2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLana Pierce / Jan McCaffrey vs Heidi Wolfe / Kory Fasing3-6, 3-6
2023-08-03vs PH YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesJan McCaffrey / Stacy Dent vs Julie Pontiff / Sarah Schoeffel2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesVirginia Reichert vs Arlene Cole6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-28vs KC-CC BLACKLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoanie Fowler / Lana Pierce vs Kerry Anders / Kara Robbins6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann Louden
published 4
3.60
Ann Olson
published 4
3.50
Jan McCaffrey
published
3.47
Ann Baldwin
published 4
3.39
Lana Pierce
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.38
Stacy Dent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.25
Virginia Reichert
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Martha Riley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Olson + Ann Louden314 matchesnot enough data
Martha Riley + Lana Pierce033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Louden
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Ann Olson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Jan McCaffrey
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Ann Baldwin
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Lana Pierce
72W–101L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.39
4
Stacy Dent
39W–72L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.38
3.5
Virginia Reichert
21W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Martha Riley
10W–28L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.