Teams

HCC Net Wisdom - W. Li

2024 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-09vs Arbor Greene LOCAs - G. BurkeLost 01
L#1 DoublesWenhong Li / Lin Zhang vs Beth Hart / Sylvie Roy3-6, 2-6
2024-03-02vs Plant City 7.0 - P. SmithWon 10
W#2 DoublesWenhong Li / Lin Zhang vs Ann Rainer / Catherine Mueller6-2, 6-1
2024-02-25vs Arbor Greene LOCAs - G. BurkeSplit 11
W#2 DoublesWenhong Li / Lin Zhang vs Beth Hart / Silvia Srour6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEmiliya Cogdill / Danna Sturman vs Caralyn Paul / Denys Hubbard3-6, 1-6
2024-02-24vs Buckhorn Spunky Ladies - N. EvansLost 01
L#1 DoublesWenhong Li / Emily Signoracci vs Debra Lowe / Janese Dennis6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-02-10vs Buckhorn Spunky Ladies - N. EvansWon 20
W#2 DoublesEmiliya Cogdill / Danna Sturman vs Debra Lowe / Anne Wooley6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesXue Chan / Wenhong Li vs Jillian Baizan / Pam Smith6-4, 6-4
2024-01-20vs Plant City 7.0 - P. SmithSplit 11
L#2 DoublesHong Liu / Emiliya Cogdill vs Sherri Bornstine / Catherine Mueller3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWenhong Li / Xue Chan vs Angie Mudge / Patricia Smith6-1, 6-1
2024-01-13vs Hills/Vickers/55&Over7.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Signoracci / Wenhong Li vs Ann Coston / Catherine Nivens6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Fan Wang
published
3.44
Emily Signoracci
published
3.39
Wenhong Li
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.34
Debbie Dawson
published 3.5
3.33
Danna Sturman
published 3.5
3.29
Emiliya Cogdill
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Lin Zhang
published
3.08
Xue Chan
published
2.79
Hong Liu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wenhong Li + Xue Chan5061% games+3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Fan Wang
32W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Emily Signoracci
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Wenhong Li
116W–62L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Debbie Dawson
18W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Danna Sturman
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Emiliya Cogdill
97W–79L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Lin Zhang
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Xue Chan
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
Hong Liu
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.