Teams

Arbor Greene LOCAs - G. Burke

2024 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.44 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-02vs Buckhorn Spunky Ladies - N. EvansWon 30
W#1 DoublesTracey Tupler / Silvia Srour vs Pam Smith / Carol Guido6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSylvie Roy / Kristine Genovese vs Debra Lowe / Cealene Stone3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCaralyn Paul / Denys Hubbard vs Barbara Rusignuolo / Janese Dennis2-2
2024-03-16vs Hills/Vickers/55&Over7.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesElaine Jones / Silvia Srour vs Alecia Collins / Debbie Beckwith3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDenys Hubbard / Caralyn Paul vs Ann Coston / Lisa Bitting6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGeri Burke / Beth Hart vs Margaret Filbert / Sharon Patterson6-2, 6-1
2024-03-09vs HCC Net Wisdom - W. LiWon 21
W#1 DoublesBeth Hart / Sylvie Roy vs Wenhong Li / Lin Zhang6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGeri Burke / Lisa Strickland vs Xue Chan / Emily Signoracci4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTracey Tupler / Joan Whitten vs Debbie Dawson / Danna Sturman4-6, 1-6
2024-02-25vs HCC Net Wisdom - W. LiLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristine Genovese / Sylvie Roy vs Emily Signoracci / Fan Wang6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Hart / Silvia Srour vs Wenhong Li / Lin Zhang2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCaralyn Paul / Denys Hubbard vs Emiliya Cogdill / Danna Sturman6-3, 6-1
2024-02-24vs Plant City 7.0 - P. SmithWon 21
L#1 DoublesSilvia Srour / Geri Burke vs Toni Kitchens / Karen Hogg4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristine Genovese / Sylvie Roy vs Sherri Bornstine / Catherine Mueller6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTracey Tupler / Joan Whitten vs Patricia Smith / Melissa Voelker6-4, 7-6
2024-02-10vs Plant City 7.0 - P. SmithWon 21
L#1 DoublesGeri Burke / Lisa Strickland vs Sherri Bornstine / Rachel Ray4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Hart / Tracey Tupler vs Angie Mudge / Ann Rainer6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJody McNamee / Joan Whitten vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-09vs Hills/Vickers/55&Over7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesGeri Burke / Beth Hart vs Lisa Bitting / Margaret Filbert1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSylvie Roy / Silvia Srour vs Debbie Beckwith / Catherine Nivens6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesElaine Jones / Joan Whitten vs Cindy Kensrue / Bonnie Miller3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-01-13vs Buckhorn Spunky Ladies - N. EvansLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth Hart / Silvia Srour vs Aurora Finucane / Carol Guido3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGeri Burke / Lisa Strickland vs Lori Boldt / Nicole Evans6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCaralyn Paul / Denys Hubbard vs Jillian Baizan / Janese Dennis3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Caralyn Paul
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Joan Whitten
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Silvia Srour
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.43
Beth Hart
published 3.5
3.34
Kristine Genovese
published
3.32
Sylvie Roy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Lisa Strickland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Geri Burke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Tracey Tupler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Elaine Jones
published
2.85
Jody McNamee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Denys Hubbard
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sylvie Roy + Joan Whitten12455% games+3.3% vs expected
Denys Hubbard + Jody McNamee10652% games+3.3% vs expected
Tracey Tupler + Jody McNamee91054% games+3.0% vs expected
Joan Whitten + Silvia Srour8361% games+3.0% vs expected
Sylvie Roy + Silvia Srour381757% games+0.2% vs expected
Silvia Srour + Caralyn Paul15856% games+0.1% vs expected
Beth Hart + Silvia Srour11856% games−1.0% vs expected
Geri Burke + Caralyn Paul16558% games−1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caralyn Paul
289W–165L career · 4 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Joan Whitten
182W–137L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Silvia Srour
244W–141L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Beth Hart
30W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Kristine Genovese
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Sylvie Roy
161W–139L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Lisa Strickland
135W–88L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Geri Burke
216W–121L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Tracey Tupler
74W–92L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Elaine Jones
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Jody McNamee
154W–118L career · 1 line in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Denys Hubbard
125W–90L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.