Teams

MSIL A18&O 3.5W Murray-Peoria

2024 MSIL Adult 18 & Over - MSIL West League · West MSIL A18 & Over 3.5W

15 players · average NTRP 3.58 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-24vs MSIL A18&O 3.5W McEwen-BloomingtonLost 03
L#1 SinglesErin Murray vs Tece Hendrickson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Sandborg / Zariah Wherry vs Lori Rebholz / Shen Dirkes2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLaura Kolb / Letitia Spirek-Algrain vs Janet Reckard / Abby Delgado7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2024-06-10vs MSIL A18&O 3.5W Chelikas-PekinLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Davis / Patricia Wombacher vs Connie Julien / Susan Naschert6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMadison Brinkman / Soonok Cramer vs Michele Kendall / Allison Cooper7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Kolb / Janice Zagardo vs Kris Wertz / Maribeth Dura5-7, 3-6
2024-06-03vs MSIL A18&O 3.5W McEwen-BloomingtonLost 03
L#1 DoublesDena Keenan / Zariah Wherry vs Amanda Lawler / Jan Dickerson5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Davis / Janice Zagardo vs Dusty McEwen / Minsun Kim1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMadison Brinkman / Soonok Cramer vs Lori Rebholz / Susan Tretter6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2024-05-13vs MSIL A18&O 3.5W Chelikas-PekinWon 21
W#1 SinglesErin Murray vs Alex Lamprecht6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Sandborg / Jane Spektor vs Diane Donnelly / Allison Cooper6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesVijeyata Arora / Letitia Spirek-Algrain vs Connie Julien / Susan Naschert1-6, 4-6
2024-05-06vs MSIL A18&O 3.5W McEwen-BloomingtonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJamie Frey / Letitia Spirek-Algrain vs Dusty McEwen / Minsun Kim2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJane Spektor / Vijeyata Arora vs Janet Reckard / Lori Rebholz5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Kolb / Janice Zagardo vs Cara Boester / Kara Leak2-6, 1-6
2024-04-22vs MSIL A18&O 3.5W Chelikas-PekinSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPatricia Wombacher / Susan Davis vs Susan Naschert / Shari Windsor6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesErin Murray vs Jaclyn Mulvey6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDena Keenan / Lindsay Kiefer vs Maribeth Dura / Michele Kendall2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSoonok Cramer / Rebecca Sandborg vs Alex Lamprecht / Connie Julien7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · West MSIL A18 & Over 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MSIL A18&O 3.5W McEwen-Bloomington5118616178
2MSIL A18&O 3.5W Chelikas-Pekin24111332234
3MSIL A18&O 3.5W Murray-Peoria2471737251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Jamie Frey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Jane Spektor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Madison Brinkman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Dena Keenan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Janice Zagardo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Soonok Cramer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Rebecca Sandborg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Patricia Wombacher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Letitia Spirek-Algrain
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Erin Murray
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Laura Kolb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsay Kiefer
published
Lisa Bennett
published
Vijeyata Arora
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Zariah Wherry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Kolb + Janice Zagardo1738% games+2.4% vs expected
Letitia Spirek-Algrain + Janice Zagardo6650% games+2.1% vs expected
Letitia Spirek-Algrain + Erin Murray5154% games+1.4% vs expected
Dena Keenan + Letitia Spirek-Algrain3645% games−11.5% vs expected
Letitia Spirek-Algrain + Patricia Wombacher4256% gamesnot enough data
Dena Keenan + Vijeyata Arora224 matchesnot enough data
Laura Kolb + Vijeyata Arora044 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Wombacher + Janice Zagardo224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jamie Frey
103W–51L career · 1 line in 2024
1%84%15%
3.85
Jane Spektor
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Madison Brinkman
80W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Dena Keenan
15W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Janice Zagardo
68W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Soonok Cramer
94W–102L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
Rebecca Sandborg
42W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Patricia Wombacher
49W–69L career · 2 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
3.5
Letitia Spirek-Algrain
44W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96
Erin Murray
23W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.90
Laura Kolb
14W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lindsay Kiefer
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Bennett
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vijeyata Arora
7W–47L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Zariah Wherry
9W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.