Teams

WNCB Acker (Aston Park)

NC Singles League 40 & Over WNC 2026 · 40+ Singles Women 3.0 - Wed PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-19vs WNCL Martin (Aston Park)Won 21
L#1 SinglesMaria Briggs vs Kirby Finger1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesSara Millar vs Colleen Flynn6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesPatricia van Vonno vs Anna Welton6-0, 6-0
2026-08-05vs WNCM Kelleher (Aston Park)Won 21
W#1 SinglesSara Millar vs Rachael Chatham5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAmelia McCormick vs Sarah Barkley6-3, 7-5
L#3 SinglesBethany Acker vs Mandy Kelleher2-6, 2-6
2026-08-01vs WNCL Martin (Aston Park)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesSara Millar vs Zephyr Sullivan6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAmelia McCormick vs Melissa Johnson0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMaria Briggs vs Anna Welton6-4, 7-5
2026-07-22vs WNCA Marcus (Black Mt)Won 21
W#1 SinglesPatricia van Vonno vs Heather Wallace1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBethany Acker vs Marie Hartye2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesKala White vs Angela Marcus5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-01vs WNCA Marcus (Black Mt)Won 21
W#1 SinglesAmelia McCormick vs Mary Cowart6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMolly Cleveland vs Heather Wallace3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesKala White vs Angela Marcus7-6, 6-0
2026-06-24vs WNCM Kelleher (Aston Park)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesSari Jensen vs Emily Richter3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBethany Acker vs Rachael Chatham1-6, 6-7
L#3 SinglesMaria Briggs vs Petra Steinbuchel3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 40+ Singles Women 3.0 - Wed PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCL Martin (Aston Park)4210818146
2WNCB Acker (Aston Park)4210821172
3WNCM Kelleher (Aston Park)3371124165
4WNCA Marcus (Black Mt)1581022159

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Sara Millar
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.78
Patricia van Vonno
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.71
Amelia McCormick
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.71
Kala White
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.56
Bethany Acker
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.42
Maria Briggs
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Molly Cleveland
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Sari Jensen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Millar
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Patricia van Vonno
22W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Amelia McCormick
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.71
Kala White
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Bethany Acker
1W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Maria Briggs
26W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.42
Molly Cleveland
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sari Jensen
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.