Teams

WNCL Martin (Aston Park)

NC Singles League 40 & Over WNC 2026 · 40+ Singles Women 3.0 - Wed PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-19vs WNCB Acker (Aston Park)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesKirby Finger vs Maria Briggs6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesColleen Flynn vs Sara Millar4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesAnna Welton vs Patricia van Vonno0-6, 0-6
2026-08-01vs WNCB Acker (Aston Park)Split 11
W#1 SinglesZephyr Sullivan vs Sara Millar1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAnna Welton vs Maria Briggs4-6, 5-7
2026-07-22vs WNCM Kelleher (Aston Park)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesLaura Martin vs Petra Steinbuchel6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAnna Welton vs Rachael Chatham1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesZephyr Sullivan vs Kirsten Petersen6-3, 6-2
2026-07-15vs WNCA Marcus (Black Mt)Won 21
W#1 SinglesColleen Flynn vs Eve Anderson6-3
W#2 SinglesLaura Martin vs Michelle Conklin6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesZephyr Sullivan vs Marie Hartye0-6, 5-7
2026-07-01vs WNCM Kelleher (Aston Park)Won 20
W#1 SinglesKirby Finger vs Emily Richter2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCatharine Connell vs Mandy Kelleher7-5, 7-5
2026-06-24vs WNCA Marcus (Black Mt)Won 20
W#2 SinglesCatharine Connell vs Michelle Conklin6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesZephyr Sullivan vs Mary Stang7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 40+ Singles Women 3.0 - Wed PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCL Martin (Aston Park)4210818146
2WNCB Acker (Aston Park)4210821172
3WNCM Kelleher (Aston Park)3371124165
4WNCA Marcus (Black Mt)1581022159

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Kirby Finger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.73
Laura Martin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.66
Colleen Flynn
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.64
Catharine Connell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.64
Zephyr Sullivan
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.53
Anna Welton
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Martin + Catharine Connell4354% games+8.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirby Finger
15W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
2.96
Laura Martin
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Colleen Flynn
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Catharine Connell
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Zephyr Sullivan
14W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Anna Welton
1W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.