Teams

The Amigos

2025 18&Over Men · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.71 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-08vs BING: GoblinsLost 03
L#1 DoublesIvan Korolev / Harsh Patel vs Todd Reasons / Max Smirnoff6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Santos Jentsch / Corey Layton vs Ryan Mirch / Joseph Hommel2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDaniel Williams vs Dustin Tang-Chung6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-01vs BING: GoblinsLost 23
W#1 DoublesPatrick Guy / Benjamin Kammerman vs Joseph Hommel / Ryan Mirch7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesRatnaksha Lele vs Dustin Tang-Chung7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIvan Korolev / Howard Brown vs Todd Reasons / Marc Houlihan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesReece Goodman vs Garrett Stoyell6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMuhammad Ali / Benjamin Santos Jentsch vs Andrew Ciaravino / Rocco Edwards3-6, 1-6
2025-06-24vs BING: GoblinsWon 31
W#1 DoublesDaniel Williams / Steven Wagner vs Todd Reasons / Connor Frey6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHarsh Patel / Ivan Korolev vs Rocco Edwards / Andrew Ciaravino2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesReece Goodman vs Dustin Tang-Chung6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHoward Brown / Muhammad Ali vs Joseph Hommel / Isaac Weissmann2-6, 2-6
2025-06-17vs BING: GoblinsWon 32
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Kammerman / Reece Goodman vs Ethan Borick / Timothy Borick6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRatnaksha Lele vs Ryan Mirch7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Williams / Patrick Guy vs Max Smirnoff / Dustin Tang-Chung7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesIvan Korolev vs Rocco Edwards6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMuhammad Ali / Harsh Patel vs Joseph Hommel / Garrett Stoyell7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-10vs BING: GoblinsWon 32
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Santos Jentsch / Muhammad Ali vs Ethan Borick / Timothy Borick0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRatnaksha Lele vs Dustin Tang-Chung6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHoward Brown / Corey Layton vs Connor Frey / Max Smirnoff2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesIvan Korolev vs Ryan Mirch6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Kammerman / Patrick Guy vs Marc Houlihan / Andrew Ciaravino6-1, 6-3
2025-06-03vs BING: GoblinsLost 12
W#1 DoublesSteven Wagner / Daniel Williams vs Garrett Stoyell / Rocco Edwards6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesReece Goodman / Patrick Guy vs Joseph Hommel / Isaac Weissmann3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesIvan Korolev vs Ryan Mirch5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-05-27vs BING: GoblinsLost 02
L#1 DoublesHoward Brown / Patrick Guy vs Joseph Hommel / Todd Reasons0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesHarsh Patel vs Dustin Tang-Chung5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BING: Goblins43181739301
2The Amigos34171841300

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Benjamin Kammerman
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.73
Steven Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Ivan Korolev
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Daniel Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.52
Harsh Patel
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.52
Reece Goodman
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.40
Patrick Guy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Howard Brown
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.12
Corey Layton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Muhammad Ali
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.94
Benjamin Santos Jentsch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Ratnaksha Lele
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Guy + Daniel Williams5158% games+9.9% vs expected
Patrick Guy + Benjamin Kammerman7063% games+6.1% vs expected
Patrick Guy + Howard Brown7262% games+5.3% vs expected
Steven Wagner + Daniel Williams13457% games+5.1% vs expected
Benjamin Santos Jentsch + Corey Layton0529% games+4.4% vs expected
Daniel Williams + Harsh Patel0538% games−3.1% vs expected
Benjamin Santos Jentsch + Muhammad Ali1535% games−7.8% vs expected
Muhammad Ali + Corey Layton0542% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Benjamin Kammerman
49W–33L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.94
Steven Wagner
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Ivan Korolev
23W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Daniel Williams
42W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Harsh Patel
13W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Reece Goodman
6W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Patrick Guy
47W–24L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Howard Brown
29W–37L career · 9 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Corey Layton
5W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.12
Muhammad Ali
27W–31L career · 7 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Benjamin Santos Jentsch
31W–53L career · 6 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Ratnaksha Lele
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.