Teams

BING: Goblins

2025 18&Over Men · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-08vs The AmigosWon 20
W#1 DoublesTodd Reasons / Max Smirnoff vs Ivan Korolev / Harsh Patel7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRyan Mirch / Joseph Hommel vs Benjamin Santos Jentsch / Corey Layton6-2, 6-0
2025-07-01vs The AmigosSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJoseph Hommel / Ryan Mirch vs Patrick Guy / Benjamin Kammerman5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTodd Reasons / Marc Houlihan vs Ivan Korolev / Howard Brown3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesGarrett Stoyell vs Reece Goodman0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrew Ciaravino / Rocco Edwards vs Muhammad Ali / Benjamin Santos Jentsch6-3, 6-1
2025-06-24vs The AmigosLost 12
L#1 SinglesRyan Mirch vs Benjamin Kammerman2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRocco Edwards / Andrew Ciaravino vs Harsh Patel / Ivan Korolev6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoseph Hommel / Isaac Weissmann vs Howard Brown / Muhammad Ali6-2, 6-2
2025-06-17vs The AmigosSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEthan Borick / Timothy Borick vs Benjamin Kammerman / Reece Goodman7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRyan Mirch vs Ratnaksha Lele6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMax Smirnoff / Dustin Tang-Chung vs Daniel Williams / Patrick Guy6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Hommel / Garrett Stoyell vs Muhammad Ali / Harsh Patel6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-10vs The AmigosSplit 22
W#1 DoublesEthan Borick / Timothy Borick vs Benjamin Santos Jentsch / Muhammad Ali6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesConnor Frey / Max Smirnoff vs Howard Brown / Corey Layton6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRyan Mirch vs Ivan Korolev1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarc Houlihan / Andrew Ciaravino vs Benjamin Kammerman / Patrick Guy1-6, 3-6
2025-06-03vs The AmigosWon 21
L#1 DoublesGarrett Stoyell / Rocco Edwards vs Steven Wagner / Daniel Williams0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoseph Hommel / Isaac Weissmann vs Reece Goodman / Patrick Guy6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRyan Mirch vs Ivan Korolev7-5, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BING: Goblins43181739301
2The Amigos34171841300

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Ethan Borick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Timothy Borick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Joseph Hommel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Ryan Mirch
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.58
Dustin Tang-Chung
usually #2 Singles 39%, also #1 Singles 39% · published
3.52
Rocco Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 27%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.50
Isaac Weissmann
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.50
Garrett Stoyell
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Marc Houlihan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.23
Andrew Ciaravino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.15
Jared Mirch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Max Smirnoff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Ciaravino + Rocco Edwards5459% games+13.4% vs expected
Garrett Stoyell + Isaac Weissmann10166% games+13.3% vs expected
Ethan Borick + Timothy Borick7071% games+5.8% vs expected
Ryan Mirch + Joseph Hommel11360% games+2.2% vs expected
Garrett Stoyell + Rocco Edwards4347% games−2.0% vs expected
Jared Mirch + Rocco Edwards134 matchesnot enough data
Isaac Weissmann + Joseph Hommel404 matchesnot enough data
Rocco Edwards + Marc Houlihan404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ethan Borick
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.92
Timothy Borick
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Joseph Hommel
38W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Ryan Mirch
32W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Dustin Tang-Chung
48W–47L career · 13 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Rocco Edwards
81W–85L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Isaac Weissmann
23W–10L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Garrett Stoyell
24W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Marc Houlihan
16W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Andrew Ciaravino
23W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jared Mirch
9W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Max Smirnoff
24W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.