Teams

Marco YMCA - D. Snyder

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-10vs Royal Poinciana - RogersWon 20
W#2 DoublesMargaret Garofalo / Dana Sacks vs Karen Broyhill / Katie Robertson6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAna Cecilia Isaza / Janet Oliver vs Kathryn Evans / Deborah Tharpe6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-03vs Pelican Marsh - EldredgeWon 10
W#3 DoublesRuth Holland / Ana Cecilia Isaza vs Cathy Arnold / Stephanie Eldredge7-6, 6-2
2022-02-10vs Grey Oaks - J. ArchieLost 01
L#2 DoublesAna Cecilia Isaza / Ruth Holland vs Cathy Burke / Frances Fitzgerald1-6, 4-6
2022-02-03vs Quail West - C. SeeseSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDana Sacks / Dawn Amato vs Carla Sancin / Jeannette Licht6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrenda Phillips / Ruth Holland vs Patricia Delaney / Ellen Iverson3-6, 5-7
2022-01-27vs Sterling Oaks - GouldLost 01
L#3 DoublesRuth Holland / Jan Jackman vs Deborah Norton / Elisabeth Beck6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-01-20vs Naples Beach Club - EddySplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Julich / Dana Sacks vs Susan Magno / Martha Peterson6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAna Cecilia Isaza / Denise Snyder vs Nancy Hansen / Nancy Kriek1-6, 3-6
2022-01-13vs Fiddlers Creek - FioreWon 20
W#1 DoublesDawn Amato / Dana Sacks vs Barbara Slifkin / Cathlin Thompson5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAna Cecilia Isaza / Ruth Holland vs Marianne Gaffney / Donna Burns6-1, 6-4
2022-01-06vs Isles of Collier - OddyWon 10
W#3 DoublesJan Jackman / Ana Cecilia Isaza vs Cathy Miles / Joyce Perry6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Dana Sacks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Ana Cecilia Isaza
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.44
Susan Julich
published
3.22
Monica Erne
published
3.18
Jan Jackman
published
2.96
Janet Oliver
published
2.93
Ruth Holland
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruth Holland + Ana Cecilia Isaza7159% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Holland + Jan Jackman3443% gamesnot enough data
Ana Cecilia Isaza + Susan Julich4350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Sacks
218W–149L career · 4 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Ana Cecilia Isaza
200W–102L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
Susan Julich
26W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
Monica Erne
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Jan Jackman
12W–34L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Janet Oliver
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.96
Ruth Holland
23W–38L career · 7 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.