Teams

Royal Poinciana - Rogers

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-10vs Marco YMCA - D. SnyderWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Rogers / Catherine Kelly vs Dawn Amato / Monica Erne6-1, 7-5
2022-03-03vs Players Club - S AshWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Rogers / Mary Ann Moschner vs Gina Dubbe / Mary Ellen Iles6-0, 6-2
2022-02-10vs Fiddlers Creek - FioreWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoan Roehr / Caroline Rogers vs Barbara Slifkin / Cathlin Thompson6-2, 6-0
2022-02-03vs Pelican Marsh - EldredgeLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Ann Moschner / Caroline Rogers vs Rosie Renfro / Fiona Prentice3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-01-30vs Isles of Collier - OddyWon 10
W#2 DoublesCaroline Rogers / Debra Stepan vs Faith Irwin / Joyce Perry6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-01-13vs Grey Oaks - J. ArchieWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Kelly / Caroline Rogers vs Joan Stolberg / Lindsey Burke6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Caroline Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.35
Catherine Kelly
published 3.5
3.13
Deborah Tharpe
published 3.5
2.95
Christine Plant
published 3.5
2.67
Celeste Denton
published 3
Joan Roehr
published
Karen Broyhill
published
Karen Guenther
published
Katie Robertson
published
Lindsay Simmons
published
Maureen Sippel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Simmons + Caroline Rogers303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Rogers
149W–130L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Catherine Kelly
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Deborah Tharpe
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Christine Plant
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Celeste Denton
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Joan Roehr
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Broyhill
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Guenther
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Katie Robertson
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lindsay Simmons
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Sippel
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.