Teams

GSTL40/Singleton/Prestwick

2025 Singles 40 & Over GSTL · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-03vs GSTL40/Yates/Phillips/DunesWon 30
W#1 SinglesKarin Davis vs Kimberly Gore6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAllison DeVaux vs Cheryl Young6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesKristy Stocks vs Pamela Yates6-1, 6-0
2025-11-02vs GSTL40/Yates/Phillips/DunesWon 30
W#1 SinglesKristy Stocks vs Amanda Hadstate6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAmy Canavan vs Susan Brady6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKarin Davis vs Cheryl Young6-3, 6-1
2025-10-20vs GSTL40/Yates/Phillips/DunesWon 30
W#1 SinglesKarin Davis vs Jennifer Phillips1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKimberly Hale vs Kimberly Gore6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesAllison DeVaux vs Pamela Yates4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-14vs GSTL40/Yates/Phillips/DunesWon 30
W#1 SinglesKristy Stocks vs Jennifer Phillips6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAmy Canavan vs Amanda Hadstate6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMichele Singleton vs Kimberly Gore6-3, 6-2
2025-10-08vs GSTL40/Yates/Phillips/DunesWon 30
W#1 SinglesKarin Davis vs Kimberly Gore6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKristy Stocks vs Cheryl Young6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMichele Singleton vs Pamela Yates6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Karin Davis
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.30
Allison DeVaux
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Michele Singleton
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.17
Kristy Stocks
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.16
Kimberly Hale
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.06
Amy Canavan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison DeVaux + Kristy Stocks5158% games+6.3% vs expected
Allison DeVaux + Michele Singleton6457% games+3.9% vs expected
Kimberly Hale + Michele Singleton044 matchesnot enough data
Amy Canavan + Michele Singleton213 matchesnot enough data
Kristy Stocks + Michele Singleton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karin Davis
22W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Allison DeVaux
42W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
Michele Singleton
39W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
Kristy Stocks
28W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Kimberly Hale
22W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Amy Canavan
31W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.