Teams

GSTL40/Yates/Phillips/Dunes

2025 Singles 40 & Over GSTL · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-03vs GSTL40/Singleton/PrestwickLost 03
L#1 SinglesKimberly Gore vs Karin Davis0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCheryl Young vs Allison DeVaux1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesPamela Yates vs Kristy Stocks1-6, 0-6
2025-11-02vs GSTL40/Singleton/PrestwickLost 03
L#1 SinglesAmanda Hadstate vs Kristy Stocks1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSusan Brady vs Amy Canavan1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesCheryl Young vs Karin Davis3-6, 1-6
2025-10-20vs GSTL40/Singleton/PrestwickLost 02
L#2 SinglesKimberly Gore vs Kimberly Hale2-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesPamela Yates vs Allison DeVaux6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-10-14vs GSTL40/Singleton/PrestwickLost 02
L#2 SinglesAmanda Hadstate vs Amy Canavan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesKimberly Gore vs Michele Singleton3-6, 2-6
2025-10-08vs GSTL40/Singleton/PrestwickLost 03
L#1 SinglesKimberly Gore vs Karin Davis0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCheryl Young vs Kristy Stocks0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesPamela Yates vs Michele Singleton1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Amanda Hadstate
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.86
Susan Brady
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.80
Pamela Yates
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.78
Kimberly Gore
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.77
Maryann Gaddy
published
2.60
Cheryl Young
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Brady + Amanda Hadstate8256% games+7.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Hadstate
22W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
Susan Brady
26W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Pamela Yates
13W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Kimberly Gore
19W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Maryann Gaddy
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cheryl Young
10W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.