Teams

Sunshiny Days

USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 3.71 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-03-27vs PTSA 8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesJoshua Harbst / Maria Turner vs Mark Rice / Kimberly Clifford6-2, 6-2
2022-03-26vs Dirty LoveLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaria Turner / Joshua Harbst vs Michael Harvey / Debbie Merritt1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Baughman/ Wagner104281434333
2Slicers95222047393
3PTSA 8.086241845406
4Swingblades68182453390
5For the Lob of It59152758425
6Between The Lines21293371455
7Sunshiny Days11383472478

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Jessica Jensen
published
3.88
Ashley Tribble
published 4
3.65
Leon Samuels
published 4
3.46
Trang Pham
published 3.5
3.35
Michael Hermes
published 3.5
3.29
Maria Turner
published 4
3.27
ChaiHuat Chong
published 3.5
3.17
Kevin Hoffman
published
3.12
Danielle Stoddard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Jeff Manzer
published
Joshua Harbst
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa della Badia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Nicola Griebe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Jensen + Kevin Hoffman10655% games−0.3% vs expected
Ashley Tribble + Leon Samuels10651% games−2.7% vs expected
ChaiHuat Chong + Maria Turner0631% games−17.1% vs expected
Jeff Manzer + Lisa della Badia12853% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Hoffman + Lisa della Badia20068% gamesnot enough data
ChaiHuat Chong + Danielle Stoddard21439% gamesnot enough data
ChaiHuat Chong + Nicola Griebe21237% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Stoddard + Joshua Harbst5648% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Jensen
84W–78L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
3.92
4
Ashley Tribble
183W–147L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Leon Samuels
115W–92L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Trang Pham
148W–124L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Michael Hermes
57W–107L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
4
Maria Turner
117W–139L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
3.29
3.5
ChaiHuat Chong
38W–98L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Kevin Hoffman
168W–126L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Danielle Stoddard
83W–139L career · 10 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Jeff Manzer
24W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joshua Harbst
46W–64L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa della Badia
168W–91L career · 15 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicola Griebe
36W–47L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.