Teams

For the Lob of It

USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

17 players · average NTRP 3.90 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-04-16vs Sunshiny DaysWon 10
W#3 DoublesBill Sharp / Amanda Steele vs ChaiHuat Chong / Nicola Griebe1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-10vs SlicersLost 01
L#1 DoublesBill Sharp / Dawn Coder vs Robert Miranda / Beth Calvo3-6, 3-6
2022-04-09vs UntouchaballsWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Kittelson / Dawna Buckingham vs Paul Hefner / Katie Servatius2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-02vs Dirty LoveLost 02
L#1 DoublesDawn Coder / Brian Kittelson vs Kerri Porritt / Rick Roby1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Mark Phillips vs Colleen Schoeck / Mike Kirby3-6, 1-6
2022-03-27vs SwingbladesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Mark Phillips vs Paul Thornton / Sondra Power-Thornton1-6, 3-6
2022-03-26vs Between The LinesWon 10
W#2 DoublesBill Sharp / Dawna Buckingham vs Buckner Harris / Nancy Baskin7-5, 6-2
2022-03-20vs TennisityLost 01
L#2 DoublesAshley Davis / Darron Peterson vs Yuzhu Zheng / Indranil Roy4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-19vs ETC Backhanded ComplimentsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarron Peterson / Gina Sharp vs Wallace Eastwood / Danielle Wicks6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-03-13vs Guys & Dolls w/BallsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMark Phillips / Dawna Buckingham vs Cardale Herzog / Marnie Newton6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBill Sharp / Michelle Phillips vs Rick Stoddard / Christine Reeds0-6, 4-6
2022-03-12vs Mixed LoveLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Mark Phillips vs Evelina Juchneviciute / Nathan Hines6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2022-03-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDawna Buckingham / Brian Kittelson vs Leslie Phillips / Ryan Stewart6-7, 1-6
2022-03-05vs Full Metal RacquetsWon 10
W#3 DoublesDawn Coder / Brian Kittelson vs Connie Bartich / Scott Anders7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Baughman/ Wagner104281434333
2Slicers95222047393
3PTSA 8.086241845406
4Swingblades68182453390
5For the Lob of It59152758425
6Between The Lines21293371455
7Sunshiny Days11383472478

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gina Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
4.04
Ashley Davis
published 4.5
4.02
Ken Coffey
published 4.5
3.85
Dawn Coder
published 4
Bill Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Brian Kittelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Dawna Buckingham
published 4
3.64
3.63
Maryann Moorhead
published 4
3.50
Jason Steele
published 3.5
3.37
Deniz Aygen
published 3.5
3.37
Russell Moorhead
published 3.5
Amanda Steele
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
Darron Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Mark Jacobsen
published 3.5
Mark Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Michelle Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Sharp + Jason Steele12263% games+6.0% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Russell Moorhead14952% games−2.9% vs expected
Amanda Steele + Jason Steele345448% games−4.0% vs expected
Ken Coffey + Tammie Sevieri-Coffey7552% games−4.0% vs expected
Ken Coffey + Amanda Steele41646% games−11.9% vs expected
Gina Sharp + Bill Sharp111547% gamesnot enough data
Gina Sharp + Mark Jacobsen81249% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Phillips + Mark Phillips3847% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gina Sharp
79W–63L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Ashley Davis
9W–16L career · type S · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Ken Coffey
117W–84L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Dawn Coder
91W–41L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Bill Sharp
53W–62L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Brian Kittelson
24W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Dawna Buckingham
94W–65L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Tammie Sevieri-Coffey
55W–38L career · type S · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Maryann Moorhead
149W–107L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Jason Steele
134W–112L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Deniz Aygen
149W–60L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Russell Moorhead
110W–102L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Amanda Steele
65W–129L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Darron Peterson
26W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Mark Jacobsen
26W–27L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Mark Phillips
12W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Phillips
42W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.