Teams

OC RCI - Bonnie

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 4.0

23 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesJennifer Lee / Daniela Chung vs SUSAN BROWN / Sung Eun Kim6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesValentina Stepanova / Huyen Tran vs Jamie Bland / Cindy Pham2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-14vs OC Costa Mesa - TriciaWon 10
W#3 DoublesSayuri Maruna / Jill Hauk vs Barbara Grom / Britta Glade6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesNina Berry / Huyen Tran vs Michelle Duenas / Marcella Cangelosi6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSayuri Maruna / Vera Garrard vs Marta Ohara / Renee Beckloff6-0, 6-2
2025-06-07vs OC CMTC - DeeSplit 11
W#1 SinglesValentina Stepanova vs Allison Herman5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNina Berry / Lori McFerren vs Heather Sepulveda / Terri Rasmussen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-17vs OC Mission Viejo - Doreen - Sat12Won 30
W#1 DoublesDaniela Chung / Jennifer Lee vs Genyll Doalson / Kristin Jones6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesValentina Stepanova vs Daphne Peace6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesYumiko Tokiwa / Vera Garrard vs Sharon Fujihara / Sherry Stone6-0, 6-3
2025-05-03vs OC Fullerton TC - Lori Sat10amWon 20
W#1 DoublesNina Berry / Liz Rapoza vs Lana Dalley / Keiko Jun6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesYumiko Tokiwa / Mercedes Natvig vs Lori Mahoney Jones / Ramona Chuang3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Daniela Chung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Valentina Stepanova
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Nina Berry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Huyen Tran
published 4
3.96
Yumiko Tokiwa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.94
Jill Hauk
published
3.93
Lori McFerren
published
3.89
Sayuri Maruna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Luna Qingyue Cai
published
3.82
Stephanie Tarzia
published
3.82
Liz Rapoza
published
3.81
Mercedes Natvig
published
3.79
Randi Lloyd
published
3.79
Vera Garrard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Bonnie Lee
published 4
3.62
Regina Jacobs
published 4
3.61
Jenny Tetley
published
3.52
Jill Muranaka
published
3.52
Mariko Sato
published
3.44
Judith Chung
published
3.36
Ashley Hay
published 3.5
3.35
Lindsay Miller
published
Trin Boykin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yumiko Tokiwa + Lori McFerren14160% games+6.9% vs expected
Yumiko Tokiwa + Sayuri Maruna13757% games+4.1% vs expected
Yumiko Tokiwa + Vera Garrard22559% games+0.0% vs expected
Regina Jacobs + Sayuri Maruna314 matchesnot enough data
Valentina Stepanova + Huyen Tran044 matchesnot enough data
Yumiko Tokiwa + Nina Berry303 matchesnot enough data
Mercedes Natvig + Vera Garrard213 matchesnot enough data
Jill Hauk + Luna Qingyue Cai123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniela Chung
65W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Valentina Stepanova
172W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Nina Berry
112W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Huyen Tran
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Yumiko Tokiwa
209W–92L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.96
Jill Hauk
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.94
Lori McFerren
24W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Sayuri Maruna
90W–56L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
Luna Qingyue Cai
10W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
Stephanie Tarzia
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.82
Liz Rapoza
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Mercedes Natvig
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Randi Lloyd
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Vera Garrard
110W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Bonnie Lee
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Regina Jacobs
71W–32L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Jenny Tetley
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Jill Muranaka
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.52
Mariko Sato
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Judith Chung
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Ashley Hay
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Lindsay Miller
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.35
Trin Boykin
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.