Teams

OC Team Courage - LPC - Nisha - Sun11

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 4.0

26 players · average NTRP 3.85 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-22vs OC RCI - BonnieWon 10
W#1 SinglesKristen Petrovacki vs Trin Boykin6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-06-14vs OC Mission Viejo - Doreen - Sat12Won 21
W#1 DoublesGretchen Cuzick / Jamie Bland vs Kari Hollerbach / Denise Vallin-Corona6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Petrovacki vs Daphne Peace6-3, 5-2
L#3 DoublesCaroline Gee / Irene Fehr vs Paula Nishibayashi / Sara Wiens6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-31vs OC Fullerton TC - Lori Sat10amWon 41
W#1 DoublesJamie Bland / Cindy Pham vs Lana Dalley / Athena Wong7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEnam Bakr vs Gladys Tan6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Sinclair / Laura Schlom vs Stacey Choi / Nicole Festini6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesShiva Shokouhi vs Rebecca Ginsburg3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCaroline Gee / Ellen Aistars vs Char Geary / Sabrina Wedge6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-05-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesKristen Petrovacki vs Allison Herman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Petrovacki vs Kathy Salter4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIrene Fehr / Laura Schlom vs Yadira Hernandez / Suzie Torres6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGretchen Cuzick / Michelle Sinclair vs Theresa Jeong / Sabrina MacLachlan6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Alexandra Gahungu
published 4.5
3.91
Kristen Petrovacki
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.90
Candice Myers
published 4
3.90
Alicia Carlin
published 4
3.78
Enam Bakr
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.74
3.74
Yukari Nobuhara
published
3.72
MALU NORTON
published
3.69
Jamie Bland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Michelle Sinclair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Susie Kim
published
3.58
Joo Han
published
3.55
Caroline Gee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Gretchen Cuzick
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.39
Ellen Aistars
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Shiva Shokouhi
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.36
JENNIFER BRASCH
published
3.36
Nisha Anish
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
CZARINA VISPERAS
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Irene Fehr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Debra Last
published 3.5
3.20
Monica Kirby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Vi Nguyen
published
Laura Schlom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Yuka Nabangxang
published
Zheng Hua
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Aistars + JENNIFER BRASCH3256% games+9.9% vs expected
Ellen Aistars + Caroline Gee6753% games+5.3% vs expected
CZARINA VISPERAS + Nisha Anish303 matchesnot enough data
Shiva Shokouhi + Gretchen Cuzick303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexandra Gahungu
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.06
4
Kristen Petrovacki
133W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Candice Myers
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
Alicia Carlin
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Enam Bakr
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Daniela Schardinger
22W–18L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Yukari Nobuhara
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
MALU NORTON
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
Jamie Bland
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Michelle Sinclair
13W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.63
Susie Kim
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Joo Han
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Caroline Gee
26W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Gretchen Cuzick
133W–84L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.52
Ellen Aistars
31W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
Shiva Shokouhi
19W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
JENNIFER BRASCH
21W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
Nisha Anish
27W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
3.5
CZARINA VISPERAS
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Irene Fehr
99W–98L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Debra Last
3W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Kirby
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
Vi Nguyen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.88
Laura Schlom
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Yuka Nabangxang
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zheng Hua
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.