Teams

Montana/Taylor18&Over3.5W

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over · Women 3.5 - 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.44 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-06-16vs Hot ShotzWon 41
W#1 DoublesTina Ovnic / Mary Wagner vs Katherine Gaddis / Joy Inman6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAlice Santos vs Rosanna Watson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnnelise Torgerson / Lori Faure vs Faye Nelson / Amy Berghold7-5, 7-6
L#2 SinglesAmanda Faure vs Diana Saros2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJulia Haggerty / Suzanne Taylor vs Susie Boyer / Diane Buss6-3, 6-2
2024-06-15vs Hot ShotzWon 50
W#1 DoublesAnnelise Torgerson / Mary Wagner vs Katherine Gaddis / Susie Boyer6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlice Santos vs Faye Nelson6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDwanna Landrum / Suzanne Taylor vs Rosanna Watson / Joy Inman6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJulia Haggerty vs Amy Berghold6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLori Faure / Amanda Faure vs Diana Saros / Diane Buss6-4, 7-5
2024-06-14vs Hot ShotzWon 32
W#1 DoublesLori Faure / Julia Haggerty vs Amy Berghold / Faye Nelson6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAmanda Faure vs Katherine Gaddis1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTina Ovnic / Mary Wagner vs Susie Boyer / Diane Buss6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAnnelise Torgerson vs Diana Saros6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Taylor / Dwanna Landrum vs Rosanna Watson / Joy Inman4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5 - 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Taylor18&Over3.5W301237108
2Hot Shotz0331224159

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Mary Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Alice Santos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Annelise Torgerson
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Lori Faure
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Tina Ovnic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Julia Haggerty
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Suzanne Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Amanda Faure
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Dwanna Landrum
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Laura Toepfer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Taylor + Julia Haggerty7753% games+4.7% vs expected
Lori Faure + Annelise Torgerson7255% games+0.0% vs expected
Tina Ovnic + Mary Wagner6849% games−1.9% vs expected
Suzanne Taylor + Tina Ovnic12751% games−2.2% vs expected
Lori Faure + Julia Haggerty3549% games−5.1% vs expected
Tina Ovnic + Annelise Torgerson4356% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Taylor + Annelise Torgerson3355% gamesnot enough data
Lori Faure + Suzanne Taylor224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mary Wagner
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Alice Santos
31W–46L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Annelise Torgerson
26W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Lori Faure
28W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Tina Ovnic
34W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Julia Haggerty
15W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Suzanne Taylor
43W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Amanda Faure
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Dwanna Landrum
19W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Toepfer
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.