Teams

Hot Shotz

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over · Women 3.5 - 18 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.36 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-06-16vs Montana/Taylor18&Over3.5WLost 14
L#1 DoublesKatherine Gaddis / Joy Inman vs Tina Ovnic / Mary Wagner4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRosanna Watson vs Alice Santos1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFaye Nelson / Amy Berghold vs Annelise Torgerson / Lori Faure5-7, 6-7
W#2 SinglesDiana Saros vs Amanda Faure6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSusie Boyer / Diane Buss vs Julia Haggerty / Suzanne Taylor3-6, 2-6
2024-06-15vs Montana/Taylor18&Over3.5WLost 05
L#1 DoublesKatherine Gaddis / Susie Boyer vs Annelise Torgerson / Mary Wagner2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesFaye Nelson vs Alice Santos2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRosanna Watson / Joy Inman vs Dwanna Landrum / Suzanne Taylor4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Berghold vs Julia Haggerty3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Saros / Diane Buss vs Lori Faure / Amanda Faure4-6, 5-7
2024-06-14vs Montana/Taylor18&Over3.5WLost 23
L#1 DoublesAmy Berghold / Faye Nelson vs Lori Faure / Julia Haggerty1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKatherine Gaddis vs Amanda Faure6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSusie Boyer / Diane Buss vs Tina Ovnic / Mary Wagner2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDiana Saros vs Annelise Torgerson0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRosanna Watson / Joy Inman vs Suzanne Taylor / Dwanna Landrum6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5 - 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Taylor18&Over3.5W301237108
2Hot Shotz0331224159

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Katherine Gaddis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Faye Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Amy Berghold
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Rosanna Watson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Susie Boyer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Diana Saros
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Diane Buss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Joy Inman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kelley Dowdell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Berghold + Faye Nelson3250% games+0.9% vs expected
Diana Saros + Amy Berghold4149% games−1.1% vs expected
Susie Boyer + Amy Berghold5450% games−1.7% vs expected
Susie Boyer + Faye Nelson4548% games−2.6% vs expected
Faye Nelson + Rosanna Watson1447% gamesnot enough data
Diane Buss + Amy Berghold044 matchesnot enough data
Susie Boyer + Kelley Dowdell123 matchesnot enough data
Susie Boyer + Diane Buss033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katherine Gaddis
16W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Faye Nelson
21W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Amy Berghold
31W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Rosanna Watson
5W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Susie Boyer
32W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Diana Saros
22W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Diane Buss
13W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
Joy Inman
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelley Dowdell
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.