Teams

VCC ORANGE

2021 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TRIO

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-04-10vs PRC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Fisher / Conn Ryan vs Eric Olsen-Dufour / Jason Kinsey4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Stoughton vs Tyus Muklebust1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Tate / Matt Yeingst vs John Wierzba / Sandy Wierzba6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-03vs CK GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesConn Ryan / Brian Fisher vs Rick Koontz / Aaron Merritt6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Goodman / Matt Yeingst vs John Ballard / Jay Wren3-6, 4-6
2021-03-27vs BM REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Heath / Steve Eller vs Roger Smith / John Motler6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesConn Ryan vs Trent Sears7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2021-03-20vs GAC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Devens / Matt Yeingst vs Michael Keirns / Christopher Habig1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesConn Ryan vs Justin Giacchino1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Goodman / Michael Tate vs Andrew Landon / Justin Culver0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MEN 3.5 - TRIO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CK GREEN237816131
2VCC ORANGE133919125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Chris Heath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Conn Ryan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.72
Robert Goodman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Matt Yeingst
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Devens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Tate
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Eller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
William Stoughton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Devens + William Stoughton134 matchesnot enough data
Matt Yeingst + Michael Tate044 matchesnot enough data
Chris Heath + Conn Ryan123 matchesnot enough data
Chris Heath + Steve Eller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Heath
27W–51L career · 1 line in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Conn Ryan
8W–47L career · 4 lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.99
Robert Goodman
4W–17L career · 2 lines in 2021
98%2%<1%
2.72
Matt Yeingst
7W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Devens
5W–19L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Michael Tate
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Steve Eller
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
William Stoughton
19W–30L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.