Teams

BM RED

2021 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TRIO

6 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-04-10vs CK GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesTodd Fenton / Trent Sears vs Aaron Merritt / Timothy Parker0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDavid Wadsworth vs Casey Vercler7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Burgess / John Motler vs John Ballard / James Ballard2-6, 2-6
2021-04-03vs GAC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesTrent Sears / Ian Campbell vs Michael Keirns / Bo Lee3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesDavid Wadsworth vs Andrew Landon1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Motler / Todd Fenton vs Justin Giacchino / Justin Culver6-3, 6-4
2021-03-27vs VCC ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesRoger Smith / John Motler vs Chris Heath / Steve Eller3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTrent Sears vs Conn Ryan7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2021-03-20vs MVCC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesIan Campbell / Trent Sears vs Steven Hardegen / Chris Vogelsang6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Cole / Roger Smith vs Dave Evenson / John Truchel3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
David Wadsworth
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.34
Michael Burgess
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Trent Sears
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.21
David Cole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
John Motler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Todd Fenton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Todd Fenton + John Motler6157% games+7.5% vs expected
David Cole + John Motler4848% games+6.0% vs expected
Michael Burgess + David Cole5450% games+3.4% vs expected
Michael Burgess + Todd Fenton8652% games−1.2% vs expected
Todd Fenton + Trent Sears033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Wadsworth
78W–37L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
Michael Burgess
41W–57L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
Trent Sears
15W–27L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
David Cole
37W–36L career · 1 line in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
John Motler
26W–27L career · 3 lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Todd Fenton
49W–60L career · 2 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.