Teams

OC Four Seasons - Fullerton TC

2025 USTA Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - OC · OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

19 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-27vs OC Yorba Linda CC - ShangWon 20
W#1 DoublesJasmine Dai / Jun Young Kim vs Melissa McCullough / Peter Muller6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCristine Kim / Jesse Huang vs Shelly Morgan / Shang Chuang6-3, 6-4
2025-06-08vs OC Lifetime RSC - DarinWon 20
W#1 DoublesJacob Shin / Susan Miller vs Jay Arthur / Kelly Tremmel6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSam Mak / Jasmine Dai vs Robert Nowak / Cristina McLamb6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.69
Mandi Collier
published 5
4.39
Daniela Chung
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.30
Dana Kim
published 4.5
Anand Jethva
published 4.5
4.12
Kumhui Feindler
published
4.05
Jasmine Dai
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.89
Jason Nam
published
3.86
Kelly Ford
published
Cristine Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Jesse Huang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Nam Kim
published
Jacob Shin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeongyean Jang
published
Jun Young Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Chung
published
Rollen Cabahug
published
Sam Mak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sangho Lee
published
Timothy Song
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Mandi Collier
188W–89L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.69
4.5
Daniela Chung
65W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
4.39
4.5
Dana Kim
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Anand Jethva
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kumhui Feindler
56W–36L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
Jasmine Dai
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Jason Nam
23W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.89
Kelly Ford
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.86
4
Cristine Kim
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jesse Huang
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.70
Nam Kim
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Jacob Shin
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jeongyean Jang
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jun Young Kim
10W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Peter Chung
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rollen Cabahug
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sam Mak
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sangho Lee
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Song
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.