Teams

OC Yorba Linda CC - Shang

2025 USTA Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - OC · OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-02vs OC Lifetime RSC - DarinWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Muller / Melissa McCullough vs Jay Arthur / Kelly Tremmel6-3, 6-4
2025-07-27vs OC Four Seasons - Fullerton TCLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa McCullough / Peter Muller vs Jasmine Dai / Jun Young Kim1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShelly Morgan / Shang Chuang vs Cristine Kim / Jesse Huang3-6, 4-6
2025-05-17vs OC Los Cab - JulieSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeff Rhode / Ramona Chuang vs Tom Tran / Stephanie Chung3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShang Chuang / Laurie Rhode vs Cynthia Turner / Calvin Lam3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Laurie Rhode
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Jeff Rhode
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Holly Bruning
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.68
Charles Breeden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Vagner Finelli
published
3.47
Shelly Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Ramona Chuang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
David Cuan
published 3.5
3.13
Melissa McCullough
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Annette Tran
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Nancy Montez
published
2.90
Gina Moore
published
Peter Muller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shang Chuang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa McCullough + David Cuan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Rhode
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Jeff Rhode
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Holly Bruning
73W–65L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Charles Breeden
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
Vagner Finelli
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.59
Shelly Morgan
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
Ramona Chuang
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.42
3.5
David Cuan
17W–22L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Melissa McCullough
22W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Annette Tran
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Nancy Montez
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Gina Moore
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Peter Muller
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shang Chuang
2W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.