Teams

Nelson

2026 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 18 & OVER · WOMEN 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-21vs Parker/GlasgowSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSarah Thomas / Elizabeth Eakin vs Krystal Glasgow / Carolyn Hickman6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDarby McCall vs Helen Mathias-Hinson2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Main / Rachel Bonfiglio vs Katie Swain / Ewa Stasiowska6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAllison Huber vs Renata Kuperus2-6, 2-6
2026-05-08vs BenningtonLost 23
W#1 DoublesSarah Thomas / Elizabeth Eakin vs Ashley Novak / Carolyn Gustavson7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDarby McCall vs Cari Hopson6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCandy Pegram / Kristin Main vs Sonya Young / Channing Bugbee3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJeanne-Marie Stevens vs Karly Fitzgerald2-3
L#3 DoublesAllison Huber / Rachel Bonfiglio vs Brooke Cranor / Wesley Barker2-6, 1-6
2026-04-18vs Parker/GlasgowWon 32
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Eakin / Sarah Thomas vs Lindsay Parker / Helen Mathias-Hinson6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKaren McCarty vs Kylie Knapp6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCandy Pegram / Kristin Main vs Ewa Stasiowska / Anna Cotten6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJeanne-Marie Stevens vs Taylor Waddle6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKaitlin Bailey / Deborah Barefoot vs Katie Swain / Carolyn Hickman3-6, 3-6
2026-04-11vs BenningtonLost 03
L#1 DoublesDarby McCall / Elizabeth Eakin vs Cari Hopson / Anna Porcelli1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJeanne-Marie Stevens vs Karly Fitzgerald0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCandy Pegram / Kaitlin Bailey vs Maggie Bennington / Brooke Johnson3-6, 4-6
2026-04-01vs BenningtonWon 31
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Eakin / Sarah Thomas vs Brooke Cranor / Ashley Novak6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDarby McCall vs Cari Hopson2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Nelson / Kristin Main vs Sonya Young / Anna Porcelli6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJeanne-Marie Stevens / Shannon Berg vs Ursula Ramsey / Wesley Barker6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-28vs Parker/GlasgowLost 03
L#1 SinglesKaren McCarty vs Renata Kuperus2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCandy Pegram / Jeanne-Marie Stevens vs Katie Swain / Anna Cotten7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKristin Main vs Carolyn Hickman6-7, 4-6
2026-03-25vs Parker/GlasgowLost 03
L#1 DoublesCandy Pegram / Karen McCarty vs Lindsay Parker / Ada Grace Brown5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaitlin Bailey / Lisa Gilbert vs Krystal Glasgow / Carolyn Hickman0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Barefoot / Lisa Phelps vs Kylie Knapp / Ewa Stasiowska6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-09vs BenningtonLost 13
L#1 DoublesRachel Bonfiglio / Sarah Thomas vs Cassie Causey / Channing Bugbee7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKaren McCarty vs Ashley Novak6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCandy Pegram / Kristin Main vs Brooke Cranor / Ursula Ramsey2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Phelps / Lisa Gilbert vs Maggie Bennington / Meredith Cramer3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WOMEN 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bennington53241638310
2Parker/Glasgow53221840323
3Nelson26142653378

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Elizabeth Eakin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.28
Darby McCall
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.26
Kristin Main
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4.5
4.13
Jeanne-Marie Stevens
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.11
Rachel Bonfiglio
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.05
Candy Pegram
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.04
Deborah Barefoot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Karen McCarty
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.96
Allison Huber
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.88
Lisa Phelps
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Kaitlin Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candy Pegram + Kristin Main224 matchesnot enough data
Karen McCarty + Candy Pegram123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Eakin
11W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Darby McCall
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Kristin Main
123W–55L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
Jeanne-Marie Stevens
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.13
Rachel Bonfiglio
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Candy Pegram
6W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Deborah Barefoot
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
4.04
Karen McCarty
21W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
4.5
Allison Huber
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.96
Lisa Phelps
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.88
Kaitlin Bailey
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.