Teams

PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CW6.5B

2022 COMBO · Women 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.31 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Angela Logan
published 4
3.38
Regina Hughes
published
3.33
Becky Reiss
published 3.5
3.26
Arlene Acosta
published 3.5
3.21
Emma Hughes
published 3
3.20
Julie Riley
published
3.16
Betsy Kemp
published 3.5
3.00
Kirsten Lang
published
2.96
Tina Tillotson
published
2.85
Malou Matthew
published
2.85
Olga Keselman
published
2.83
Fedwa Booth
published 3
2.77
Anita Lifson
published 3
2.67
Elaine Marshall
published 3
Mary Akli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Hughes + Emma Hughes5357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Logan
28W–22L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
Regina Hughes
36W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Becky Reiss
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Arlene Acosta
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Emma Hughes
14W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%5%95%
3.21
Julie Riley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Betsy Kemp
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Kirsten Lang
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.00
Tina Tillotson
3W–13L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.96
Malou Matthew
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
Olga Keselman
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Fedwa Booth
12W–23L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Anita Lifson
6W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Elaine Marshall
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Mary Akli
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.