Teams

RID BASS (Bulls)

2026 FW USTA Adult Fall - Men · 3.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.42 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-04vs RTC LOVESplit 22
W#1 DoublesJohn Deibel / Kyle Lindquist vs Leo Moore / William Kincaid4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJacob Dekeratry vs Caleb Rea6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Smith / Rod Ryer vs Michael Love / Landon Love3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJack Delk / Jeff Yale vs Otis Kue / Sean McPherson0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Jacob Dekeratry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
John Deibel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Eric Dion
published 3.5
3.38
Jesse Robinett
published
3.35
Kyle Lindquist
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Rod Ryer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Jeremiah Russell
published
3.21
Cooper Conger
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
David Bass
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Joey Brignac
published
3.00
Michael Krupp
published
2.98
Jeff Yale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Bruce Jordan
published 3.5
Jack Delk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Trent Woody
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Deibel + Kyle Lindquist6261% games+6.6% vs expected
David Bass + Kyle Lindquist10655% games−0.5% vs expected
Jeff Yale + Joey Brignac134 matchesnot enough data
Michael Krupp + David Bass033 matchesnot enough data
Joey Brignac + Jesse Robinett123 matchesnot enough data
Jesse Robinett + Jeremiah Russell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacob Dekeratry
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
John Deibel
25W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Eric Dion
11W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.38
Jesse Robinett
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Kyle Lindquist
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
Rod Ryer
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
Jeremiah Russell
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Cooper Conger
8W–2L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
David Bass
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Joey Brignac
5W–17L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.13
Michael Krupp
4W–11L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
Jeff Yale
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.98
3.5
Bruce Jordan
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Jack Delk
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Trent Woody
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.